Radiation Dose Proportions of Localizer Radiograph and Bolus Tracking in Low-dose Pediatric Cardiothoracic Computed Tomography

Overview

Journal Pediatr Radiol

Date 2025 Jan 31

PMID 39888399

Authors

Hyun Woo Goo

Seon Young Goo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Optimization of localizer radiograph and bolus tracking doses is necessary, as their dose proportion may increase with a decreasing diagnostic scan dose in pediatric cardiothoracic computed tomography (CT).

Objective: To evaluate the radiation dose proportions of the localizer radiograph and bolus tracking in low-dose pediatric cardiothoracic CT.

Materials And Methods: For low-dose pediatric cardiothoracic CT, a posteroanterior localizer radiograph was acquired with 80 kV, and 35 mA or 20 mA in 852 infants (age<1 year). Propensity score matching was employed in comparing the 35 mA and 20 mA groups on dose proportion, over z-axis proportion, visibility of anatomic landmarks, and image noise. The over z-axis coverage proportion was correlated with the dose proportion of the localizer radiograph in both groups. Additionally, bolus tracking was performed in 1,015 children (≤2 years). The effects of the number of monitoring scan, dose-length product of the diagnostic scan, age, and water-equivalent area of the scanned patient body on the radiation dose proportion of bolus tracking were evaluated.

Results: The dose proportion of the localizer radiograph was significantly lower in the 20 mA group (2.5%, n = 94) than in the 35 mA group (6.5%, n = 94) (P < 0.001). While image noise was higher in the 20 mA group (2.1 Hounsfield units versus 1.0 Hounsfield units of the 35 mA-group, P < 0.001), all the anatomic landmarks remained visible in all cases. The over z-axis coverage proportion demonstrated high correlations with the dose proportion for both groups (R = 0.736, P < 0.001 for the 35 mA group and R = 0.660, P < 0.001 for the 20 mA group). The bolus tracking dose-length product proportion demonstrated the strongest positive correlation with the number of monitoring scans (R = 0.93, P < 0.001), while age, diagnostic scan dose-length product, and water-equivalent area showed weak negative correlations (R-values = -0.46~-0.50, P-values < 0.001).

Conclusions: In low-dose pediatric cardiothoracic CT, the dose proportion of the localizer radiograph can be substantially reduced with a low tube current setting while maintaining image quality. Additionally, minimization of the over z-axis coverage proportion merits attention. The number of monitoring scans is the most significant factor for increasing the radiation dose proportion of bolus tracking, especially in young ages.

References

Hoye J, Sharma S, Zhang Y, Fu W, Ria F, Kapadia A . Organ doses from CT localizer radiographs: Development, validation, and application of a Monte Carlo estimation technique. Med Phys. 2019; 46(11):5262-5272. PMC: 7327952. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13781. View

Goo H . Is It Better to Enter a Volume CT Dose Index Value before or after Scan Range Adjustment for Radiation Dose Optimization of Pediatric Cardiothoracic CT with Tube Current Modulation?. Korean J Radiol. 2018; 19(4):692-703. PMC: 6005958. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.692. View

Goo H . State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11(1):4-18. PMC: 2799649. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.4. View

Hui P, Goo H, Du J, Ip J, Kanzaki S, Kim Y . Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD). Pediatr Radiol. 2017; 47(8):899-910. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3847-4. View

Rigsby C, McKenney S, Hill K, Chelliah A, Einstein A, Han B . Radiation dose management for pediatric cardiac computed tomography: a report from the Image Gently 'Have-A-Heart' campaign. Pediatr Radiol. 2018; 48(1):5-20. PMC: 6230472. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3991-x. View

Hong S, Goo H, Maeda E, Choo K, Tsai I . User-Friendly Vendor-Specific Guideline for Pediatric Cardiothoracic Computed Tomography Provided by the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Congenital Heart Disease Study Group: Part 1. Imaging Techniques. Korean J Radiol. 2019; 20(2):190-204. PMC: 6342752. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0571. View

Francone M, Gimelli A, Budde R, Caro-Dominguez P, Einstein A, Gutberlet M . Radiation safety for cardiovascular computed tomography imaging in paediatric cardiology: a joint expert consensus document of the EACVI, ESCR, AEPC, and ESPR. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; 23(8):e279-e289. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac048. View

Mitchell D, Rowan M, Loughman E, Ridge C, MacMahon P . Contrast monitoring techniques in CT pulmonary angiography: An important and underappreciated contributor to breast dose. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 86:184-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.011. View

Goo H . Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41(7):839-47. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2121-4. View

10.

Schmidt B, Saltybaeva N, Kolditz D, Kalender W . Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs. Med Phys. 2013; 40(8):084301. DOI: 10.1118/1.4813296. View

11.

Bohrer E, Schafer S, Mader U, Noel P, Krombach G, Fiebich M . Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs. Z Med Phys. 2016; 27(2):145-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.09.004. View

12.

Schmidt B, Hupfer M, Saltybaeva N, Kolditz D, Kalender W . Dose Optimization for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiographs for Low-Dose Lung Computed Tomography Examinations. Invest Radiol. 2016; 52(2):81-86. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000311. View

13.

Saltybaeva N, Krauss A, Alkadhi H . Technical Note: Radiation dose reduction from computed tomography localizer radiographs using a tin spectral shaping filter. Med Phys. 2018; 46(2):544-549. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13353. View

14.

Nomura K, Fujii K, Goto T, Tsukagoshi S, Ota H, Iwabuchi Y . Radiation Dose Reduction for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiography Using an Ag Additional Filter. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2021; 45(1):84-92. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001026. View

15.

Frush D . Technique of pediatric thoracic CT angiography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005; 43(2):419-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.09.013. View

16.

Hollingsworth C, Yoshizumi T, Frush D, Chan F, Toncheva G, Nguyen G . Pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography: assessment of radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189(1):12-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.1507. View

17.

Schindler P, Kehl H, Wildgruber M, Heindel W, Schulke C . Cardiac CT in the Preoperative Diagnostics of Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: Radiation Dose Optimization by Omitting Test Bolus or Bolus Tracking. Acad Radiol. 2019; 27(5):e102-e108. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.07.019. View

18.

Johnson P, Christensen G, Fishman E . I.v. contrast administration with dual source 128-MDCT: a randomized controlled study comparing 18-gauge nonfenestrated and 20-gauge fenestrated catheters for catheter placement success, infusion rate, image quality, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(6):1166-70. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11730. View

19.

Yoshiura T, Masuda T, Matsumoto Y, Sato T, Yamashita Y, Kobayashi Y . [Usefulness of Fenestrated Catheters for i.v. Contrast Infusion Cardiac CT Angiography for Newborn Patients during the Congenital Heart Disease]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2019; 75(8):765-770. DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.8.765. View

20.

Kim J, Kim E, Hur J, Ham J, Kim Y, Choi S . The Usefulness of Fenestrated Intravenous Catheters Compared With Nonfenestrated Catheter for Cardiac Multidetector Computed Tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019; 43(3):423-427. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000855. View