» Articles » PMID: 23927364

Assessment of Patient Dose from CT Localizer Radiographs

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2013 Aug 10
PMID 23927364
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: With recently introduced technical innovations for CT systems, the dose of CT scan acquisitions has been substantially reduced; even effective dose values below 1 mSv have been reported. Due to this development, dose of the localizer radiograph may contribute substantially to dose of the whole CT examination. Since there are only limited data in the literature regarding patient dose for the different types of localizer radiographs, patient dose values were estimated in our study by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations and compared to dose values of typical CT examinations.

Methods: First, dose distributions were measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for three different body regions (head, thorax, abdomen-pelvic) and three positions of the x-ray tube (AP, PA, and lateral views); measured values were compared to simulated data using Monte Carlo techniques for validation purposes. Second, organ and effective dose values for the various investigated localizer radiograph scenarios were calculated and compared with published dose values for standard CT and low-dose CT examinations.

Results: For the anthropomorphic phantom, deviations of the dose values between measured and calculated results were in the range of 15%. Organ and effective dose values showed a strong dependence on the tube position. The largest differences were observed for chest localizer radiographs in the female phantom for the dose to the breast (AP: 1.01 mGy vs PA: 0.24 mGy). Overall effective dose values were in the range of 0.04-0.42 mSv per localizer radiograph acquisition.

Conclusions: In view of the technical dose-reducing innovations in CT, localizer radiographs may substantially contribute to the total dose of the whole CT examination, particularly in the case of dedicated low-dose scans used, e.g., for young patients or screening purposes. Optimization of dose in localizer radiographs should be pursued further in the same way as it was done in CT.

Citing Articles

Radiation dose proportions of localizer radiograph and bolus tracking in low-dose pediatric cardiothoracic computed tomography.

Goo H, Goo S Pediatr Radiol. 2025; 55(3):466-478.

PMID: 39888399 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-025-06163-z.


Comparing organ and effective dose of various CT localizer acquisition strategies: A Monte Carlo study.

Oostveen L, Tunissen S, Sechopoulos I Med Phys. 2024; 52(1):576-584.

PMID: 39395203 PMC: 11699993. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17447.


Applying the AAPM 293 report to estimate the absorbed dose during head computed tomography: using head circumference for rapid dose estimation.

Chen T, Kong X, Peng W, Liao T, Hu H, Pan N Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(5):3140-3149.

PMID: 37179955 PMC: 10167459. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-983.


Patient dose reduction for a localizer radiograph with an additional tin filter in chest-abdomen-pelvis, spine, and head computed tomography examinations.

Takemitsu M, Takegami K, Kudomi S, Kawanami K Radiol Phys Technol. 2023; 16(2):160-167.

PMID: 36754947 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00701-w.


Impacts of Phantom Off-Center Positioning on CT Numbers and Dose Index CTDIv: An Evaluation of Two CT Scanners from GE.

Zheng X, Gutsche L, Al-Hayek Y, Stanton J, Elshami W, Jensen K J Imaging. 2021; 7(11).

PMID: 34821866 PMC: 8625132. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7110235.