» Articles » PMID: 39859993

Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices As Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Life (Basel)
Date 2025 Jan 25
PMID 39859993
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. For patients with end-stage HF who are not candidates for heart transplantation, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide mechanical circulatory support as a long-term solution, known as destination therapy (DT).

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to synthesize evidence on the survival rates, complications, and quality-of-life improvements associated with LVADs used as destination therapy in patients with end-stage HF.

Methods: A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus, was conducted to identify relevant studies. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from 12 studies were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model. Survival rates, complications (e.g., infection and bleeding), and quality-of-life measures were the primary outcomes evaluated.

Results: The analysis showed significant improvements in survival, with a pooled effect size of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.306-1.390, = 0.002). Complication rates varied, with infections and bleeding being the most common adverse events. Quality of life also improved significantly post-LVAD implantation, with a standardized mean difference of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65-0.91).

Conclusions: LVADs as destination therapy provide a viable option for improving the survival and quality of life of end-stage HF patients, despite the associated risks of complications. Further research is needed to refine patient selection and management strategies to optimize outcomes.

References
1.
Kato T, Chokshi A, Singh P, Khawaja T, Cheema F, Akashi H . Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling. Circ Heart Fail. 2011; 4(5):546-53. PMC: 3178740. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962142. View

2.
Slaughter M, Rogers J, Milano C, Russell S, Conte J, Feldman D . Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(23):2241-51. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909938. View

3.
Rose E, Moskowitz A, Packer M, Sollano J, Williams D, Tierney A . The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points. Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 67(3):723-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00042-9. View

4.
Mehra M, Uriel N, Naka Y, Cleveland Jr J, Yuzefpolskaya M, Salerno C . A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(17):1618-1627. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900486. View

5.
Ujeyl A, Kruger M . [Rise of the machines? Left ventricular assist devices for treatment of severe heart failure]. Herz. 2015; 40(7):972-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00059-015-4365-5. View