Advanced Heart Failure Treated with Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Patients with advanced heart failure have improved survival rates and quality of life when treated with implanted pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices as compared with medical therapy. New continuous-flow devices are smaller and may be more durable than the pulsatile-flow devices.
Methods: In this randomized trial, we enrolled patients with advanced heart failure who were ineligible for transplantation, in a 2:1 ratio, to undergo implantation of a continuous-flow device (134 patients) or the currently approved pulsatile-flow device (66 patients). The primary composite end point was, at 2 years, survival free from disabling stroke and reoperation to repair or replace the device. Secondary end points included survival, frequency of adverse events, the quality of life, and functional capacity.
Results: Preoperative characteristics were similar in the two treatment groups, with a median age of 64 years (range, 26 to 81), a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 17%, and nearly 80% of patients receiving intravenous inotropic agents. The primary composite end point was achieved in more patients with continuous-flow devices than with pulsatile-flow devices (62 of 134 [46%] vs. 7 of 66 [11%]; P<0.001; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.54; P<0.001), and patients with continuous-flow devices had superior actuarial survival rates at 2 years (58% vs. 24%, P=0.008). Adverse events and device replacements were less frequent in patients with the continuous-flow device. The quality of life and functional capacity improved significantly in both groups.
Conclusions: Treatment with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in patients with advanced heart failure significantly improved the probability of survival free from stroke and device failure at 2 years as compared with a pulsatile device. Both devices significantly improved the quality of life and functional capacity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121485.)
Evaluation of hemolysis in patients supported with Impella 5.5: a single center experience.
Clothier J, Kobsa S, Lester L, Rajeev N, Bojko M, Praeger J J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025; 20(1):143.
PMID: 40022133 PMC: 11871597. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-025-03352-7.
Sood A, Prasada Rao A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1371443.
PMID: 39981347 PMC: 11841463. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1371443.
Recent Developments in Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.
Moctezuma-Ramirez A, Mohammed H, Hughes A, Elgalad A Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 26(1):25440.
PMID: 39867170 PMC: 11760545. DOI: 10.31083/RCM25440.
Khoufi E Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1).
PMID: 39859993 PMC: 11767145. DOI: 10.3390/life15010053.
Welp H, Sindermann J, Scherer M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).
PMID: 39597849 PMC: 11594585. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226705.