A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: In two interim analyses of this trial, patients with advanced heart failure who were treated with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device were less likely to have pump thrombosis or nondisabling stroke than were patients treated with a mechanical-bearing axial-flow left ventricular assist device.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients with advanced heart failure to receive either the centrifugal-flow pump or the axial-flow pump irrespective of the intended goal of use (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The composite primary end point was survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. The principal secondary end point was pump replacement at 2 years.
Results: This final analysis included 1028 enrolled patients: 516 in the centrifugal-flow pump group and 512 in the axial-flow pump group. In the analysis of the primary end point, 397 patients (76.9%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group, as compared with 332 (64.8%) in the axial-flow pump group, remained alive and free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device at 2 years (relative risk, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 for superiority). Pump replacement was less common in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (12 patients [2.3%] vs. 57 patients [11.3%]; relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.38; P<0.001). The numbers of events per patient-year for stroke of any severity, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were lower in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group.
Conclusions: Among patients with advanced heart failure, a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device was associated with less frequent need for pump replacement than an axial-flow device and was superior with respect to survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. (Funded by Abbott; MOMENTUM 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224755.).
Multicenter study for CH-VAD as a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device.
Lu Y, Zhao S, Han J, Lv Q, Du X, Hua Z iScience. 2025; 28(2):111764.
PMID: 40008363 PMC: 11850155. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111764.
Sood A, Prasada Rao A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1371443.
PMID: 39981347 PMC: 11841463. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1371443.
The experience of bodily image for patients with left ventricular assist device.
Milaniak I, Witkowska E, Cebula M, Tomsia P, Wasilewski G, Gorkiewicz-Kot I Front Psychiatry. 2025; 15:1484428.
PMID: 39931192 PMC: 11808206. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1484428.
Wermine K, Gohar S, Milhoan R, Youree B, Ramarathnam V, Alqaim M J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2025; 11(2):101715.
PMID: 39896821 PMC: 11787573. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101715.
Veen K, Ahmed M, Stark C, Botta L, Anastasiadis K, Bernhardt A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025; 67(2).
PMID: 39874447 PMC: 11879288. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf016.