Feed-forward Loop Improves the Transient Dynamics of an Antithetic Biological Controller

Overview

Journal J R Soc Interface

Date 2025 Jan 21

PMID 39837484

Authors

Thales R Spartalis

Mathias Foo

Xun Tang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Integral controller is widely used in industry for its capability of endowing perfect adaptation to disturbances. To harness such capability for precise gene expression regulation, synthetic biologists have endeavoured in building biomolecular (quasi-)integral controllers, such as the antithetic integral controller. Despite demonstrated successes, challenges remain with designing the controller for improved transient dynamics and adaptation. Here, we explore and investigate the design principles of alternative RNA-based biological controllers, by modifying an antithetic integral controller with prevalently found natural feed-forward loops (FFL), to improve its transient dynamics and adaptation performance. With model-based analysis, we demonstrate that while the base antithetic controller shows excellent responsiveness and adaptation to system disturbances, incorporating the type-1 incoherent FFL into the base antithetic controller could attenuate the transient dynamics caused by changes in the stimuli, especially in mitigating the undesired overshoot in the output gene expression. Further analysis on the kinetic parameters reveals similar findings to previous studies that the degradation and transcription rates of the circuit RNA species would dominate in shaping the performance of the controllers.

Citing Articles

Feed-forward loop improves the transient dynamics of an antithetic biological controller.

Spartalis T, Foo M, Tang X J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240467.

PMID: 39837484 PMC: 11750367. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0467.

References

Barajas C, Del Vecchio D . Synthetic biology by controller design. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022; 78:102837. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102837. View

Waters L, Storz G . Regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Cell. 2009; 136(4):615-28. PMC: 3132550. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.043. View

Huang H, Qian Y, Del Vecchio D . A quasi-integral controller for adaptation of genetic modules to variable ribosome demand. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):5415. PMC: 6303309. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07899-z. View

Mangan S, Alon U . Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(21):11980-5. PMC: 218699. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2133841100. View

Frei T, Chang C, Filo M, Arampatzis A, Khammash M . A genetic mammalian proportional-integral feedback control circuit for robust and precise gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(24):e2122132119. PMC: 9214505. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122132119. View

Liu W, Shomron N . Analysis of MicroRNA Regulation and Gene Expression Variability in Single Cell Data. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(10). PMC: 9605646. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101750. View

Vaghy M, Otero-Muras I, Pajaro M, Szederkenyi G . A Kinetic Finite Volume Discretization of the Multidimensional PIDE Model for Gene Regulatory Networks. Bull Math Biol. 2024; 86(2):22. PMC: 10803439. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-023-01251-3. View

Kim M, Rai N, Zorraquino V, Tagkopoulos I . Multi-omics integration accurately predicts cellular state in unexplored conditions for Escherichia coli. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:13090. PMC: 5059772. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13090. View

Baetica A, Leong Y, Murray R . Guidelines for designing the antithetic feedback motif. Phys Biol. 2020; 17(5):055002. DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/ab8454. View

10.

Smolen P, Baxter D, Byrne J . Modeling transcriptional control in gene networks--methods, recent results, and future directions. Bull Math Biol. 2000; 62(2):247-92. DOI: 10.1006/bulm.1999.0155. View

11.

Ma W, Trusina A, El-Samad H, Lim W, Tang C . Defining network topologies that can achieve biochemical adaptation. Cell. 2009; 138(4):760-73. PMC: 3068210. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.013. View

12.

Briat C, Gupta A, Khammash M . Antithetic Integral Feedback Ensures Robust Perfect Adaptation in Noisy Biomolecular Networks. Cell Syst. 2016; 2(1):15-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.01.004. View

13.

Shannon B, Zamora-Chimal C, Postiglione L, Salzano D, Grierson C, Marucci L . Feedback Control of an Antithetic Molecular-Titration Motif in Using Microfluidics. ACS Synth Biol. 2020; 9(10):2617-2624. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00105. View

14.

Zong D, Sadeghpour M, Molinari S, Alnahhas R, Hirning A, Giannitsis C . Tunable Dynamics in a Multistrain Transcriptional Pulse Generator. ACS Synth Biol. 2023; 12(12):3531-3543. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00434. View

15.

Cuba Samaniego C, Franco E . Ultrasensitive molecular controllers for quasi-integral feedback. Cell Syst. 2021; 12(3):272-288.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.01.001. View

16.

Westbrook A, Tang X, Marshall R, Maxwell C, Chappell J, Agrawal D . Distinct timescales of RNA regulators enable the construction of a genetic pulse generator. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019; 116(5):1139-1151. DOI: 10.1002/bit.26918. View

17.

Sczakiel G . The design of antisense RNA. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1997; 7(4):439-44. DOI: 10.1089/oli.1.1997.7.439. View

18.

Hiscock T . Adapting machine-learning algorithms to design gene circuits. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(1):214. PMC: 6487017. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2788-3. View

19.

Chakravarty S, Csikasz-Nagy A . Systematic analysis of noise reduction properties of coupled and isolated feed-forward loops. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(12):e1009622. PMC: 8641863. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009622. View

20.

Vera M, Biswas J, Senecal A, Singer R, Park H . Single-Cell and Single-Molecule Analysis of Gene Expression Regulation. Annu Rev Genet. 2016; 50:267-291. PMC: 5149423. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-034854. View