» Articles » PMID: 14530388

Structure and Function of the Feed-forward Loop Network Motif

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2003 Oct 8
PMID 14530388
Citations 741
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Engineered systems are often built of recurring circuit modules that carry out key functions. Transcription networks that regulate the responses of living cells were recently found to obey similar principles: they contain several biochemical wiring patterns, termed network motifs, which recur throughout the network. One of these motifs is the feed-forward loop (FFL). The FFL, a three-gene pattern, is composed of two input transcription factors, one of which regulates the other, both jointly regulating a target gene. The FFL has eight possible structural types, because each of the three interactions in the FFL can be activating or repressing. Here, we theoretically analyze the functions of these eight structural types. We find that four of the FFL types, termed incoherent FFLs, act as sign-sensitive accelerators: they speed up the response time of the target gene expression following stimulus steps in one direction (e.g., off to on) but not in the other direction (on to off). The other four types, coherent FFLs, act as sign-sensitive delays. We find that some FFL types appear in transcription network databases much more frequently than others. In some cases, the rare FFL types have reduced functionality (responding to only one of their two input stimuli), which may partially explain why they are selected against. Additional features, such as pulse generation and cooperativity, are discussed. This study defines the function of one of the most significant recurring circuit elements in transcription networks.

Citing Articles

Temporal dose inversion properties of adaptive biomolecular circuits.

Nakamura E, Blanchini F, Giordano G, Hoffmann A, Franco E bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990486 PMC: 11844413. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.10.636967.


Feed-forward loop improves the transient dynamics of an antithetic biological controller.

Spartalis T, Foo M, Tang X J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240467.

PMID: 39837484 PMC: 11750367. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0467.


Integration of basal and apical embryo lineage regulators controls F-actin cable integrity and zygote asymmetry in .

Xiong F, Zhang Z, Gong W, Hermann M, Bak D, Garbsch F Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(1):e2402720122.

PMID: 39793089 PMC: 11725860. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402720122.


Getting it right: suppression and leveraging of noise in robust decision-making.

Bhalerao R Quant Plant Biol. 2025; 5():e10.

PMID: 39777031 PMC: 11706686. DOI: 10.1017/qpb.2024.10.


Mechanistic Modeling the Role of MicroRNAs and Transcription Factors in Disease Progression.

Bhat G, Shaik Mohammad A Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2883:195-230.

PMID: 39702710 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4290-0_9.


References
1.
Bray D . Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells. Nature. 1995; 376(6538):307-12. DOI: 10.1038/376307a0. View

2.
Guet C, Elowitz M, Hsing W, Leibler S . Combinatorial synthesis of genetic networks. Science. 2002; 296(5572):1466-70. DOI: 10.1126/science.1067407. View

3.
Maslov S, Sneppen K . Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science. 2002; 296(5569):910-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1065103. View

4.
Rosenfeld N, Elowitz M, Alon U . Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. J Mol Biol. 2002; 323(5):785-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00994-4. View

5.
Elowitz M, Leibler S . A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature. 2000; 403(6767):335-8. DOI: 10.1038/35002125. View