» Articles » PMID: 39763609

U-shaped Relationship Between Serum Uric Acid and Gastric Cancer Risk: a Large Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2025 Jan 7
PMID 39763609
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We conducted this study to investigate the relationship between serum uric acid (SUA) levels and the risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study with 475659 cancer-free participants from the UK Biobank. All subjects were grouped into quartiles, and we used a Cox proportional hazards model to analyze the association between SUA levels and the risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer and explore the potential sex-specific relationship.

Results: Of the 475659 participants, 883 eventually developed upper gastrointestinal cancers over a median follow-up period of 6.7 years. We observed that SUA level was positively correlated with the risk of female oral cancer (hazard ratio (95% CI): 2.05(1.03,4.06)) and negatively associated with the risk of esophageal cancer in the general population (hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.65(0.45,0.93)). The risk of gastric cancer in males showed a U-shaped trend, decreasing and then increasing as SUA levels increased (hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.51(0.32,0.81)). The risk of small intestine cancer in females showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing with increasing SUA levels (hazard ratio (95% CI): 3.34(1.10,10.13)). Interaction analysis indicated that various factors, such as age, sex, smoking and drinking status, family history of cancer and BMI might play an important role in the relationship between SUA and cancer.

Conclusion: SUA levels are positively associated with the risk of oral cancer risk in females and negatively associated with the risk of esophageal cancer in the general population. Both low and high SUA levels were associated with increased risk of gastric cancer, supporting a U-shaped association.

References
1.
Mandal A, Mount D . The molecular physiology of uric acid homeostasis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014; 77:323-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170343. View

2.
Dhankhar R, Dahiya K, Sharma T, Ghalaut V, Atri R, Kaushal V . Diagnostic significance of adenosine deaminase, uric acid and C-reactive protein levels in patients of head and neck carcinoma. Clin Lab. 2011; 57(9-10):795-8. View

3.
Liu D, Yun Y, Yang D, Hu X, Dong X, Zhang N . What Is the Biological Function of Uric Acid? An Antioxidant for Neural Protection or a Biomarker for Cell Death. Dis Markers. 2019; 2019:4081962. PMC: 6348815. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4081962. View

4.
Deng Z, Gu Y, Hou X, Zhang L, Bao Y, Hu C . Association between uric acid, cancer incidence and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: Shanghai diabetes registry study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015; 32(3):325-32. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2724. View

5.
Kuhn T, Sookthai D, Graf M, Schubel R, Freisling H, Johnson T . Albumin, bilirubin, uric acid and cancer risk: results from a prospective population-based study. Br J Cancer. 2017; 117(10):1572-1579. PMC: 5680462. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.313. View