The Influence of Electronic Health Record Design on Usability and Medication Safety: Systematic Review

Overview

Journal BMC Health Serv Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2025 Jan 6

PMID 39762805

Authors

Marie Cahill

Brian J Cleary

Shane Cullinan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The advantages of electronic health records (EHRs) are well-documented regarding the process of care, enhanced data accessibility and cost savings. However, EHR design can also contribute to usability challenges, with poorly designed EHRs being implicated in user errors including patient overdoses. Our study seeks to evaluate how EHR design influences both usability and medication safety.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the ACM library from 1 January 2009 to 8 October 2024. Eligible studies reported on the impact of specific EHR design elements on usability and/or medication safety, involved healthcare providers and took place in a secondary, tertiary or quaternary care setting. Usability was defined as the extent to which an EHR can be used to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction, while medication safety related to the risk of drug-related problems, including adverse drug events and medication errors. Design features identified within studies were validated, by cross-referencing these elements with ISO standards regarding design recommendations. A narrative synthesis was conducted, with studies tabulated based on whether they assessed usability and/or medication safety. Patterns were identified and common design elements between studies translated into themes. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate study quality and PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout.

Results: Thirty-two studies were identified. The design features described in these studies fit within seven broad design themes: searchability, automation, customisation, data entry, workflow, user guidance and interoperability. EHR systems that prioritised these areas were associated with higher reported usability and enhanced medication safety, while the opposite was found for systems that overlooked these design aspects. Our review also highlighted the numerous ways these themes can be implemented, while identifying the contributing factors that enable their successful implementation.

Conclusion: The design of EHRs can enhance or undermine usability and medication safety, depending on the searchability and customisability of these systems, how data entry processes and provider workflow are facilitated and how automation, user guidance and interoperability are implemented. Future EHR evaluations should be performed throughout the design process and consensus building is required regarding what exactly constitutes a design element, within an EHR context.

References

Fernando B, Kalra D, Morrison Z, Byrne E, Sheikh A . Benefits and risks of structuring and/or coding the presenting patient history in the electronic health record: systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(4):337-46. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000450. View

Simpao A, Ahumada L, Desai B, Bonafide C, Galvez J, Rehman M . Optimization of drug-drug interaction alert rules in a pediatric hospital's electronic health record system using a visual analytics dashboard. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 22(2):361-9. PMC: 11749158. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002538. View

Ratwani R, Fairbanks R, Hettinger A, Benda N . Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1179-82. PMC: 11737839. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv050. View

Melnick E, Harry E, Sinsky C, Dyrbye L, Wang H, Trockel M . Perceived Electronic Health Record Usability as a Predictor of Task Load and Burnout Among US Physicians: Mediation Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(12):e23382. PMC: 7785404. DOI: 10.2196/23382. View

Gildon B, Condren M, Hughes C . Impact of Electronic Health Record Systems on Prescribing Errors in Pediatric Clinics. Healthcare (Basel). 2019; 7(2). PMC: 6627567. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7020057. View

Tawfik D, Profit J, Morgenthaler T, Satele D, Sinsky C, Dyrbye L . Physician Burnout, Well-being, and Work Unit Safety Grades in Relationship to Reported Medical Errors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018; 93(11):1571-1580. PMC: 6258067. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.014. View

Kruse C, Mileski M, Dray G, Johnson Z, Shaw C, Shirodkar H . Physician Burnout and the Electronic Health Record Leading Up to and During the First Year of COVID-19: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(3):e36200. PMC: 9015762. DOI: 10.2196/36200. View

Zhang R, Burgess E, Reddy M, Rothrock N, Bhatt S, Rasmussen L . Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open. 2019; 2(1):73-80. PMC: 6447042. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz001. View

West C, Dyrbye L, Sinsky C, Trockel M, Tutty M, Nedelec L . Resilience and Burnout Among Physicians and the General US Working Population. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(7):e209385. PMC: 7333021. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9385. View

10.

Meidani Z, Zand F, Zare S, Shirdeli M, Sharifian R, Ouhadian M . Usability Assessment of an Electronic Medical Record-Embedded Clinical Decision Support System for Arterial Blood Gas Interpretation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023; 305:456-459. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI230530. View

11.

Li E, Clarke J, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Neves A . The Impact of Electronic Health Record Interoperability on Safety and Quality of Care in High-Income Countries: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(9):e38144. PMC: 9523524. DOI: 10.2196/38144. View

12.

Thompson D, Velasco F, Classen D, Raddemann R . Reducing clinical costs with an EHR. Healthc Financ Manage. 2010; 64(10):106-8, 110, 112 passim. View

13.

Thurmann P . Methods and systems to detect adverse drug reactions in hospitals. Drug Saf. 2001; 24(13):961-8. DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200124130-00003. View

14.

Halbesleben J, Wakefield D, Wakefield B . Work-arounds in health care settings: Literature review and research agenda. Health Care Manage Rev. 2007; 33(1):2-12. DOI: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304495.95522.ca. View

15.

Persson J, Rydenfalt C . Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(6):e26694. PMC: 8277335. DOI: 10.2196/26694. View

16.

Ratwani R, Fairbanks T, Savage E, Adams K, Wittie M, Boone E . Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(4):1069-1087. PMC: 5228144. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0105. View

17.

Ratwani R, Savage E, Will A, Fong A, Karavite D, Muthu N . Identifying Electronic Health Record Usability And Safety Challenges In Pediatric Settings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018; 37(11):1752-1759. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0699. View

18.

Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles J, Karsh B . Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15(4):408-23. PMC: 2442264. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2616. View

19.

Black K, Snyder N, Zhou M, Zhu Z, Uptegraft C, Chintalapani A . An Electronic Health Record Alert for Inpatient Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccinations Increases Vaccination Ordering and Uncovers Workflow Inefficiencies. Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(1):192-198. PMC: 10917607. DOI: 10.1055/a-2250-6305. View

20.

Yen P, Bakken S . Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 19(3):413-22. PMC: 3341772. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000020. View