» Articles » PMID: 30976756

Provider Perspectives on the Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in an Electronic Health Record

Overview
Journal JAMIA Open
Date 2019 Apr 13
PMID 30976756
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into electronic health records (EHRs) can improve patient-provider communication and delivery of care. However, new system implementation in health-care institutions is often accompanied by a change in clinical workflow and organizational culture. This study examines how well an EHR-integrated PRO system fits clinical workflows and individual needs of different provider groups within 2 clinics.

Materials And Methods: Northwestern Medicine developed and implemented an EHR-integrated PRO system within the orthopedics and oncology departments. We conducted interviews with 11 providers who had interacted with the system. Through thematic analysis, we synthesized themes regarding provider perspectives on clinical workflow, individual needs, and system features.

Results: Our findings show that EHR-integrated PROs facilitate targeted conversation with patients and automated triage for psychosocial care. However, physicians, psychosocial providers, and medical assistants faced different challenges in their use of the PRO system. Barriers mainly stemmed from a lack of actionable data, workflow disruption, technical issues, and a lack of incentives.

Discussion: This study sheds light on the ecosystem around EHR-integrated PRO systems (such as user needs and organizational factors). We present recommendations to address challenges facing PRO implementation, such as optimizing data collection and auto-referral processes, improving data visualizations, designing effective educational materials, and prioritizing the primary user group.

Conclusion: PRO integration into routine care can be beneficial but also require effective technology design and workflow configuration to reach full potential use. This study provides insights into how patient-generated health data can be better integrated into clinical practice and care delivery processes.

Citing Articles

The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.

Cahill M, Cleary B, Cullinan S BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):31.

PMID: 39762805 PMC: 11705737. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12060-2.


Predictors of Concordance between Patient-Reported and Provider-Documented Symptoms in the Context of Cancer and Multimorbidity.

Gilbertson-White S, Albashayreh A, Ji Y, Bandyopadhyay A, Zeinali N, Cherwin C Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(5):1130-1139.

PMID: 39721578 PMC: 11669442. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791820.


Impact of immigration background on feasibility of electronic patient-reported outcomes in advanced urothelial cancer patients.

Yurdakul O, Alan A, Krauter J, Korn S, Gust K, Shariat S Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):107.

PMID: 39696509 PMC: 11657869. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02325-z.


A systematic review of qualitative studies examining barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeon engagement with patient-reported outcome measures data.

Heath E, Harris I, Romero L, Ackerman I J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):144.

PMID: 39692995 PMC: 11655713. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00820-x.


Perceptions of Implementing Real-Time Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes and Digital Analytics in a Majority-Minority Cancer Center.

Arcos D, Dagsi M, Nasr R, Nguyen C, Ng D, Chan A JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024; 8:e2400188.

PMID: 39571110 PMC: 11594559. DOI: 10.1200/CCI-24-00188.


References
1.
Wagner L, Schink J, Bass M, Patel S, Varela Diaz M, Rothrock N . Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer. 2014; 121(6):927-34. PMC: 4352124. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29104. View

2.
Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K . Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(9):1846-1858. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv181. View

3.
Pearman T, Garcia S, Penedo F, Yanez B, Wagner L, Cella D . Implementation of distress screening in an oncology setting. J Community Support Oncol. 2016; 13(12):423-8. DOI: 10.12788/jcso.0198. View

4.
Urowitz S, Wiljer D, Dupak K, Kuehner Z, Leonard K, Lovrics E . Improving diabetes management with a patient portal: a qualitative study of diabetes self-management portal. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(6):e158. PMC: 3510725. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2265. View

5.
Basch E, Deal A, Kris M, Scher H, Hudis C, Sabbatini P . Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 34(6):557-65. PMC: 4872028. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. View