» Articles » PMID: 11735652

Methods and Systems to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitals

Overview
Journal Drug Saf
Specialties Pharmacology
Toxicology
Date 2001 Dec 12
PMID 11735652
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitals offers the chance to detect serious ADRs resulting in hospitalisation and ADRs occurring in hospitalised patients, i.e. patients with high comorbidity and receiving drugs that are administered only in hospitals. The most commonly applied methods involve stimulated spontaneous reporting of doctors and nurses, comprehensive collection by trained specialists and, more recently, computer-assisted approaches using routine data from hospital information systems. The different methods of ADR detection used result in different rates and types of ADRs and, consequently, in different drug classes being responsible for these ADRs. Another factor influencing the results of surveys is the interpretation of the term ADR, where some authors adhere to the strict definition of the World Health Organization and many others include intended and unintended poisoning as well as errors in prescribing and dispensing, thus referring to adverse drug events. Depending on the method used for screening of patients, a high number of possible ADRs and only few definite ADRs are found, or vice versa. These variations have to be taken into account when comparing the results of further analyses performed with these data. ADR rates and incidences in relation to the number of drugs prescribed or patients exposed have been calculated in only a few surveys and projects, and this interesting pharmacoepidemiological approach deserves further study. In addition, the pharmacoeconomic impact of ADRs, either resulting in hospitalisation or prolonging hospital stay, has been estimated using different approaches. However, a common standardised procedure for such calculations has not yet been defined. Although detection of ADRs in hospitals offers the opportunity to detect severe ADRs of newly approved drugs, these ADRs are still discovered by spontaneous reporting systems. The prospects offered by electronic hospital information systems as well as implementation of pharmacoepidemiological approaches increases the possibilities and the value of ADR detection in hospitals.

Citing Articles

The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.

Cahill M, Cleary B, Cullinan S BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):31.

PMID: 39762805 PMC: 11705737. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12060-2.


Prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital Among Older Patients with and Without Dementia.

Sakiris M, Hilmer S, Sawan M, Lo S, Kelly P, Blyth F Drugs Aging. 2024; 41(10):833-846.

PMID: 39342531 PMC: 11480104. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01148-3.


Incidence and patterns of adverse drug reactions among adult patients hospitalized in the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital: A prospective observational follow-up study.

Sendekie A, Kassie Netere A, Tesfaye S, Dagnew E, Belachew E PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0282096.

PMID: 36827307 PMC: 9955665. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282096.


Exploring Healthcare Professionals' Practices and Attitudes towards Monitoring and Reporting of Severe Adverse Drug Reactions.

Srisuriyachanchai W, Cox A, Jarernsiripornkul N Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(6).

PMID: 35742128 PMC: 9222361. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061077.


Incidence of adverse drug events in patients hospitalized in the medical wards of a teaching referral hospital in Ethiopia: a prospective observational study.

Ersulo T, Yizengaw M, Tesfaye B BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022; 23(1):30.

PMID: 35581618 PMC: 9115930. DOI: 10.1186/s40360-022-00570-w.


References
1.
Landis N . ADE rate uncertain, reporting systems inadequate, GAO tells legislators. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000; 57(6):515-6, 519. DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/57.6.515. View

2.
Classen D, Burke J, Pestotnik S, Evans R, Stevens L . Surveillance for quality assessment: IV. Surveillance using a hospital information system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991; 12(4):239-44. DOI: 10.1086/646331. View

3.
Moore N, Lecointre D, Noblet C, Mabille M . Frequency and cost of serious adverse drug reactions in a department of general medicine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 45(3):301-8. PMC: 1873369. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00667.x. View

4.
Hallas J, Gram L, Grodum E, Damsbo N, Brosen K, Haghfelt T . Drug related admissions to medical wards: a population based survey. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992; 33(1):61-8. PMC: 1381200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb04001.x. View

5.
Hurwitz N . Predisposing factors in adverse reactions to drugs. Br Med J. 1969; 1(5643):536-9. PMC: 1982240. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5643.536. View