A Pilot Study for Assessing NAO Humanoid Robot Assistance in Shoulder Rehabilitation

Overview

Journal J Exp Orthop

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Dec 31

PMID 39737429

Authors

Alessandra Raso

Martina Pulcinelli

Emiliano Schena

Alfio Puglisi

Giovanni Pioggia

Arianna Carnevale

Umile Giuseppe Longo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the potential application of NAO in guiding patients through rehabilitative exercises using external audiovisual stimuli, focusing on temporospatial control in terms of range of motion (ROM), execution time and movement smoothness.

Methods: This is a preliminary analysis involving ten healthy volunteers and two patients with shoulder musculoskeletal disorders. The protocol was developed in two phases (III and IV) with different ROM limits and including flexion-extension (FE), external-rotation (ER) and internal-rotation (IR) exercises, performed at two speeds and both with and without NAO assistance. Simultaneously, upper limb kinematics were assessed using a stereophotogrammetric system as a reference. Performance was evaluated by mean absolute error (MAE) for ROM and execution time, with smoothness assessed through Log Dimensionless Jerk analysis.

Results: In phase III, results for volunteers showed ROM differences in FE and ER, while IR was unaffected by NAO presence. In phase IV, NAO assistance resulted in reduced MAE across nearly all exercises. Patients who only performed phase III exercises at lower speed stayed within ROM limits for all movements performed with NAO, except for ER. For all the participants, results showed a significant reduction in the time MAE when using NAO. Patients exhibit greater smoothness during FE performed with NAO.

Conclusions: NAO showed potential in aiding patients with shoulder musculoskeletal disorders to replicate rehabilitation exercises, guiding both ROM and timing while influencing movement smoothness. NAO imitation could lead to improved rehabilitation outcomes and enhanced motor learning of motor skills, fostering greater adherence to prescribed therapy.

Level Of Evidence: Level V, diagnostic.

Citing Articles

A pilot study for assessing NAO humanoid robot assistance in shoulder rehabilitation.

Raso A, Pulcinelli M, Schena E, Puglisi A, Pioggia G, Carnevale A J Exp Orthop. 2024; 12(1):e70122.

PMID: 39737429 PMC: 11683783. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70122.

References

Blavette L, Rigaud A, Anzalone S, Kergueris C, Isabet B, Dacunha S . A Robot-Mediated Activity Using the Nao Robot to Promote COVID-19 Precautionary Measures among Older Adults in Geriatric Facilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(9). PMC: 9100999. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095222. View

Wu G, van der Helm F, Veeger H, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005; 38(5):981-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042. View

Teo J, Zheng Z, Bird S . Identifying the factors affecting 'patient engagement' in exercise rehabilitation. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022; 14(1):18. PMC: 8819209. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00407-3. View

Puglisi A, Capri T, Pignolo L, Gismondo S, Chila P, Minutoli R . Social Humanoid Robots for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of Modalities, Indications, and Pitfalls. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(7). PMC: 9316169. DOI: 10.3390/children9070953. View

Shafir T, Brown S . Timing and the control of rhythmic upper-limb movements. J Mot Behav. 2010; 42(1):71-84. DOI: 10.1080/00222890903397137. View

Franceschi F, Longo U, Ruzzini L, Rizzello G, Denaro V . Arthroscopic management of calcific tendinitis of the subscapularis tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15(12):1482-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0340-x. View

Balasubramanian S, Melendez-Calderon A, Roby-Brami A, Burdet E . On the analysis of movement smoothness. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12:112. PMC: 4674971. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-015-0090-9. View

Tomita Y, Rodrigues M, Levin M . Upper Limb Coordination in Individuals With Stroke: Poorly Defined and Poorly Quantified. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31(10-11):885-897. DOI: 10.1177/1545968317739998. View

Longo U, Papalia R, Castagna A, De Salvatore S, Guerra E, Piergentili I . Shoulder replacement: an epidemiological nationwide study from 2009 to 2019. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):889. PMC: 9526311. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05849-x. View

10.

Maffulli N, Longo U . Conservative management for tendinopathy: is there enough scientific evidence?. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008; 47(4):390-1. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken011. View

11.

Carnevale A, Mannocchi I, Schena E, Carli M, Sassi M, Marino M . Performance Evaluation of an Immersive Virtual Reality Application for Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(11). PMC: 10668954. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10111305. View

12.

Carnevale A, Longo U, Schena E, Massaroni C, Presti D, Berton A . Wearable systems for shoulder kinematics assessment: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):546. PMC: 6858749. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2930-4. View

13.

Thigpen C, Shaffer M, Gaunt B, Leggin B, Williams G, Wilcox 3rd R . The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(4):521-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.018. View

14.

Parry S, Knight L, Connolly B, Baldwin C, Puthucheary Z, Morris P . Factors influencing physical activity and rehabilitation in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43(4):531-542. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4685-4. View

15.

Franceschi F, Longo U, Ruzzini L, Rizzello G, Maffulli N, Denaro V . The Roman Bridge: a "double pulley - suture bridges" technique for rotator cuff repair. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8:123. PMC: 2235854. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-123. View

16.

Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, Kugler J, Elsner B . Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (11):CD006876. PMC: 6465047. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub4. View

17.

Zhang X, Wang D, Wang Z, Ling S, Yung P, Tuan R . Clinical perspectives for repairing rotator cuff injuries with multi-tissue regenerative approaches. J Orthop Translat. 2022; 36:91-108. PMC: 9428729. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.06.004. View

18.

Raso A, Pulcinelli M, Schena E, Puglisi A, Pioggia G, Carnevale A . A pilot study for assessing NAO humanoid robot assistance in shoulder rehabilitation. J Exp Orthop. 2024; 12(1):e70122. PMC: 11683783. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70122. View

19.

Marin-Medina D, Arenas-Vargas P, Arias-Botero J, Gomez-Vasquez M, Jaramillo-Lopez M, Gaspar-Toro J . New approaches to recovery after stroke. Neurol Sci. 2023; 45(1):55-63. PMC: 10761524. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07012-3. View

20.

Ostor A, Richards C, Prevost A, Speed C, Hazleman B . Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005; 44(6):800-5. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh598. View