» Articles » PMID: 39734911

Reducing Sedation for Pediatric Thoracic CT Imaging Using Volumetric Target-mode EKG Gating

Overview
Date 2024 Dec 30
PMID 39734911
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Many children require sedation for imaging. We aimed to reduce sedation for thoracic (chest and cardiac) computed tomography (CT) scans in children 0-4 years old from 65% to 20% by December 2018 and to sustain.

Methods: We counted baseline, intervention, and a follow-up period thoracic CT scans performed with sedation in children 0-4 years old. We developed a new volumetric target-mode electrocardiogram-gated CT imaging protocol to reduce scan time and control for factors that decrease image quality. Additional interventions included technologist training, communication to radiologists and clinicians, and eliminating a default request for sedation accompanying the electronic order for most thoracic CT scans. A statistical process control chart tracked data to study process changes over time.

Results: During the baseline and intervention periods, 232 of 357 and 217 of 794 scans required sedation. Interventions created 2 centerline shifts. Overall, thoracic CT scans in children 0-4 years old requiring sedation decreased from 65% to 24% and was sustained 5 years later. No patients during the baseline period, one (1 of 794, 0.1%) during the intervention period and 2 (2 of 480, 0.4%) during the audit period 5 years later, initially had nondiagnostic nonsedated scans that required an additional scan with sedation.

Conclusions: We developed a volumetric target-mode electrocardiogram-gated CT protocol, eliminated default sedation ordering, and trained and educated staff to reduce sedation in young children undergoing thoracic CT scans. The frequency of sedation for thoracic CT in children 0-4 years old decreased from 65% to 24% and was sustained after revising imaging parameters and eliminating a default sedation order.

References
1.
Runge S, Christensen N, Jensen K, Jensen I . Children centered care: Minimizing the need for anesthesia with a multi-faceted concept for MRI in children aged 4-6. Eur J Radiol. 2018; 107:183-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.026. View

2.
Kroft L, Roelofs J, Geleijns J . Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16- detector row CT acquisitions. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 40(3):294-300. PMC: 2817802. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-009-1436-x. View

3.
Sargent M, McEachern A, Jamieson D, Kahwaji R . Atelectasis on pediatric chest CT: comparison of sedation techniques. Pediatr Radiol. 1999; 29(7):509-13. DOI: 10.1007/s002470050632. View

4.
Stern K, Gauvreau K, Geva T, Benavidez O . The impact of procedural sedation on diagnostic errors in pediatric echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014; 27(9):949-55. PMC: 4149941. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.024. View

5.
Jadhav S, Golriz F, Atweh L, Zhang W, Krishnamurthy R . CT angiography of neonates and infants: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of target mode prospectively ECG-gated 320-MDCT and ungated helical 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204(2):W184-91. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12846. View