Does Transport Affect the Eating Quality Potential of Beef from Limousin Cows in France? - A Case Study

Overview

Journal Vet Anim Sci

Specialty Veterinary Medicine

Date 2024 Dec 6

PMID 39639873

Authors

Nathalia da Silva Rodrigues Mendes

Renato Rodrigues Silva

Moise Kombolo-Ngah

Pierre-Philippe Rivet

Jerome Tondusson

Tatianne Ferreira De Oliveira

Sghaier Chriki

Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury

Jean-Francois Hocquette

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We hypothesized that transportation might impact beef sensory quality, particularly as the distance between farms and the slaughterhouse increases. Specifically, we expected that pre-slaughter transport over longer distances would induce stress in the cattle, resulting in elevated ultimate pH and, consequently, reduced beef quality. Thus, this study aimed to specifically study the effects of transport in commercial conditions of Limousin cows from farms located in different areas of France to slaughter on ultimate pH (pHu) measured in the muscle (LT), marbling (two major factors affecting eating quality) and the MSA Index (a global indicator of potential eating quality at the carcass level). Cattle were studied according to distance (<50 km; between 50 and 150 km; and between 150 and 250 km from the slaughterhouse) and according to transport time from the farm to the slaughterhouse (divided into short, moderate, and extended). We found that neither distance nor transport time significantly affected pHu of beef and the other studied parameters (cold carcass weight, meat color, MSA Marbling and MSA Index). Consequently, in our commercial conditions, we concluded that the effects of transport on beef carcasses and beef eating quality of Limousin cows are negligible.

References

Gonzalez L, Schwartzkopf-Genswein K, Bryan M, Silasi R, Brown F . Benchmarking study of industry practices during commercial long haul transport of cattle in Alberta, Canada. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90(10):3606-17. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4770. View

Prache S, Adamiec C, Astruc T, Baeza-Campone E, Bouillot P, Clinquart A . Review: Quality of animal-source foods. Animal. 2021; 16 Suppl 1:100376. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100376. View

Pethick D, Hocquette J, Scollan N, Dunshea F . Review: Improving the nutritional, sensory and market value of meat products from sheep and cattle. Animal. 2021; 15 Suppl 1:100356. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100356. View

Deng L, He C, Zhou Y, Xu L, Xiong H . Ground transport stress affects bacteria in the rumen of beef cattle: A real-time PCR analysis. Anim Sci J. 2016; 88(5):790-797. DOI: 10.1111/asj.12615. View

Gagaoua M, Picard B, Monteils V . Associations among animal, carcass, muscle characteristics, and fresh meat color traits in Charolais cattle. Meat Sci. 2018; 140:145-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.004. View

Mendes N, Silva R, De Oliveira T, Ellies-Oury M, Hocquette J, Chriki S . Does transport stress have any effect on carcass quality of Nellore cattle () in Brazil? - A case study. Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txad134. PMC: 11087730. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txad134. View

Schwartzkopf-Genswein K, Faucitano L, Dadgar S, Shand P, Gonzalez L, Crowe T . Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review. Meat Sci. 2012; 92(3):227-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010. View

Lomiwes D, Farouk M, Wu G, Young O . The development of meat tenderness is likely to be compartmentalised by ultimate pH. Meat Sci. 2013; 96(1):646-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.022. View

Polkinghorne R, Philpott J, Thompson J . Do extended transport times and rest periods impact on eating quality of beef carcasses?. Meat Sci. 2018; 140:101-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.017. View

10.

Wigham E, Butterworth A, Wotton S . Assessing cattle welfare at slaughter - Why is it important and what challenges are faced?. Meat Sci. 2018; 145:171-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.010. View

11.

Stewart S, Gardner G, McGilchrist P, Pethick D, Polkinghorne R, Thompson J . Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage. Meat Sci. 2020; 181:108322. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108322. View

12.

Mendonca F, Vaz R, Vaz F, Leal W, Silveira I, Restle J . Causes of bruising in carcasses of beef cattle during farm, transport, and slaughterhouse handling in Brazil. Anim Sci J. 2018; 90(2):288-296. DOI: 10.1111/asj.13151. View

13.

Santinello M, Rampado N, Penasa M, Hocquette J, Pethick D, De Marchi M . The Meat Standards Australia carcass grading site affects assessment of marbling and prediction of meat-eating quality in growing European beef cattle. Meat Sci. 2024; 213:109501. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109501. View

14.

Bonny S, Pethick D, Legrand I, Wierzbicki J, Allen P, Farmer L . European conformation and fat scores have no relationship with eating quality. Animal. 2016; 10(6):996-1006. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115002839. View

15.

Gruber S, Tatum J, Engle T, Chapman P, Belk K, Smith G . Relationships of behavioral and physiological symptoms of preslaughter stress to beef longissimus muscle tenderness. J Anim Sci. 2009; 88(3):1148-59. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2183. View

16.

Hultgren J, Schiffer K, Babol J, Berg C . Animal Welfare and Food Safety When Slaughtering Cattle Using the Gunshot Method. Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(4). PMC: 8868530. DOI: 10.3390/ani12040492. View

17.

Astruc T, Terlouw E . Towards the use of on-farm slaughterhouse. Meat Sci. 2023; 205:109313. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109313. View

18.

Hughes J, Clarke F, Purslow P, Warner R . High pH in beef longissimus thoracis reduces muscle fibre transverse shrinkage and light scattering which contributes to the dark colour. Food Res Int. 2017; 101:228-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.003. View

19.

Clinquart A, Ellies-Oury M, Hocquette J, Guillier L, Sante-Lhoutellier V, Prache S . Review: On-farm and processing factors affecting bovine carcass and meat quality. Animal. 2022; 16 Suppl 1:100426. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100426. View

20.

Nielsen S, Alvarez J, Bicout D, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe J . Welfare of cattle during transport. EFSA J. 2022; 20(9):e07442. PMC: 9449995. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7442. View