» Articles » PMID: 39632835

Assessing the Economic Impact of Obesity and Overweight on Employers: Identifying Opportunities to Improve Work Force Health and Well-being

Overview
Journal Nutr Diabetes
Date 2024 Dec 5
PMID 39632835
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Obesity is a major public health issue, significantly affecting national and individual health and economic well-being. This study quantifies the economic impact of excess body weight on employers and employees in 2023, offering insights for obesity prevention and treatment.

Methods: We utilized data from the National Health Interview Survey, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, and Current Population Survey. Published reports and original estimates were combined to assess the economic burden for the U.S. and across seven major industries (Construction, Education & Health, Financial Activities, Government, Manufacturing, Professional & Business Services, and Transportation & Utilities). We compared the economic outcomes for adults with obesity and overweight to those with healthy weight, focusing on direct and indirect costs. Potential savings from different weight loss scenarios were estimated using the Disease Prevention & Treatment Microsimulation Model.

Results: In 2023, among 158 million civilian employees on nonfarm payrolls, 30% had obesity and 34% had overweight, resulting in a combined economic burden of $425.5 billion (obesity: $347.5 billion; overweight: $78 billion). This includes excess medical costs of obesity ($115 billion), presenteeism (obesity: $113.8 billion; overweight: $46.5 billion), absenteeism from obesity ($82.3 billion), excess medical costs of overweight ($31.5 billion), obesity-related disability payments ($31.1 billion), and workers' compensation payments ($5.2 billion). For a hypothetical firm with 10,000 employees (plus dependents), the annual costs were $22 million for obesity and $4.9 million for overweight, with average costs of $6472 per employee with obesity, $1244 per employee with overweight, $1514 per adult dependent with obesity, and $380 per adult dependent with overweight. Medical savings over 5 years range from $153.3 billion with a 5% weight loss to $326.1 billion with 25% weight loss at the industry level.

Conclusion: The substantial economic costs imposed by obesity and overweight on employers and employees highlight the need for resources dedicated to treatment and prevention, which can result in reduced medical expenses and improved productivity.

Citing Articles

Assessing the economic impact of obesity and overweight on employers: identifying opportunities to improve work force health and well-being.

Dall T, Sapra T, Natale Z, Livingston T, Chen F Nutr Diabetes. 2024; 14(1):96.

PMID: 39632835 PMC: 11618327. DOI: 10.1038/s41387-024-00352-9.

References
1.
Cawley J, Biener A, Meyerhoefer C, Ding Y, Zvenyach T, Smolarz B . Direct medical costs of obesity in the United States and the most populous states. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021; 27(3):354-366. PMC: 10394178. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.20410. View

2.
Van Nuys K, Globe D, Ng-Mak D, Cheung H, Sullivan J, Goldman D . The association between employee obesity and employer costs: evidence from a panel of U.S. employers. Am J Health Promot. 2014; 28(5):277-85. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.120905-QUAN-428. View

3.
Nielsen J, Hulman A, Witte D . Spousal cardiometabolic risk factors and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a prospective analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Diabetologia. 2018; 61(7):1572-1580. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4587-1. View

4.
Ramasamy A, Laliberte F, Aktavoukian S, Lejeune D, DerSarkissian M, Cavanaugh C . Direct and Indirect Cost of Obesity Among the Privately Insured in the United States: A Focus on the Impact by Type of Industry. J Occup Environ Med. 2019; 61(11):877-886. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001693. View

5.
Groves J, Wilcox V . The impact of overweight and obesity on unemployment duration among young American workers. Econ Hum Biol. 2023; 51:101280. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101280. View