» Articles » PMID: 39610950

Feasibility and Benefit of Decompressive Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (dPEG) in Advanced Cancer Patients with Malignant Bowel Obstruction

Overview
Journal Endosc Int Open
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Nov 29
PMID 39610950
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bowel obstruction is a common complication in advanced cancer patients. Patients are restricted in quality of life (QOL) due to nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain. Prospective data on the feasibility and benefit of decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG) are scarce. Patients suffering from symptomatic bowel obstruction due to advanced cancer were included prospectively in a single-center study when other treatments to eliminate the obstruction were impossible. Patients were given a questionnaire the day before dPEG (d-1) and, if the procedure was successful, the day after (d+1) and 14 days after the procedure (d14). Furthermore, lifetime after dPEG was assessed. 53 patients were included. dPEG was technically feasible in 34 of 53 (64.2%). Significant improvement could be shown for nausea and vomiting when comparing d-1 to d+1 (nausea ( = 0.002), vomiting ( < 0.001)) and when comparing d-1 to d14 ( = 0.021 and = 0.003, respectively). Comparing d+1 to d14, there was no further improvement. QOL improved significantly from 8.1 (mean) on d-1 to 5.9 (mean) on d+1 ( < 0.001). Median survival after successful dPEG was 27 days (range 2-353). dPEG is an effective method for quickly relieve symptoms of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer patients. However, the technical success rate is limited and needs to be improved. Prospective studies comparing endoscopic and computed tomography-guided procedures are needed to avoid unsuccessful procedures in patients with advanced cancer and limited life expectancy.

References
1.
Tuca A, Roca R, Sala C, Porta J, Serrano G, Gonzalez-Barboteo J . Efficacy of granisetron in the antiemetic control of nonsurgical intestinal obstruction in advanced cancer: a phase II clinical trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008; 37(2):259-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.01.014. View

2.
Marks W, Perkal M, Schwartz P . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for gastric decompression in metastatic gynecologic malignancies. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993; 177(6):573-6. View

3.
Tradounsky G . Palliation of gastrointestinal obstruction. Can Fam Physician. 2012; 58(6):648-52, e317-21. PMC: 3374686. View

4.
Panzer S, Harris M, Berg W, Ravich W, Kalloo A . Endoscopic ultrasound in the placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in the non-transilluminated abdominal wall. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42(1):88-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70253-9. View

5.
Campagnutta E, Cannizzaro R, Gallo A, Zarrelli A, Valentini M, De Cicco M . Palliative treatment of upper intestinal obstruction by gynecological malignancy: the usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1996; 62(1):103-5. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0197. View