» Articles » PMID: 26838026

Decompressive Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Advanced Cancer Patients with Small-bowel Obstruction is Feasible and Effective: a Large Prospective Study

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2016 Feb 4
PMID 26838026
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-centered outcomes of decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG) in patients with malignant bowel obstruction due to advanced gynecological and gastroenteric malignancies.

Methods: This is a prospective analysis of 158 consecutive patients with small-bowel obstruction from advanced gynecological and gastroenteric cancer who underwent PEG or percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) positioning for decompressive purposes from 2002 to 2012. All of them had previous abdominal surgery and were unfit for any other surgical procedures. Symptom relief, procedural complications, and post dPEG palliation were assessed. Global Quality of Life (QoL) was evaluated in the last 2 years (25 consecutive patients) before and 7 days after dPEG placement using the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS).

Results: dPEG was successfully performed in 142 out of 158 patients (89.8 %). Failure of tube placement occurred in 16 patients (10.1 %). In 8/142 (5.6 %) patients, dPEG was guided by abdominal ultrasound. In 3/142 patients, dPEG was CT-guided. In 14 (9.8 %) patients, who had previously undergone total or subtotal gastrectomy, decompressive percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (dPEJ) was performed. In 1/14 patients, dPEJ was CT-guided. Out of 142 patients, 110 (77.4 %) experienced relief from nausea and vomiting 2 days after PEG. Out of 142 patients, 116 (81.6 %) were discharged. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days (range 3-60). Peristomal infection (14 %) and intermittent obstruction (8.4 %) were the most frequent complications associated with PEG. Median survival time was 57 days (range 4-472) after PEG placement. Twenty-five patients had QoL properly evaluated with SDS score before and 7 days after dPEG. Sixteen patients (64 %) out of 25 exhibited an improvement of QoL (p < 0.05), 7 (28 %) patients exhibited a non-significant worsening of QoL (p = 0.18), and in 2 (8 %) patients, it remained unmodified.

Conclusions: dPEG is feasible, effective, relieves nausea and vomiting in patients with unremitting small-bowel obstruction from advanced gynecological and gastroenteric cancer, and improves QoL.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and benefit of decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG) in advanced cancer patients with malignant bowel obstruction.

Wanzl J, Hofer S, Schwamberger T, Tadic V, Muzalyova A, Hainsch-Muller I Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(11):E1411-E1416.

PMID: 39610950 PMC: 11604304. DOI: 10.1055/a-2458-9919.


Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Patients with Gynaecological Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Toth R, Toth Z, Loczi L, Torok M, Acs N, Varbiro S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064252 PMC: 11277705. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144213.


Inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: palliative interventions outcomes - mixed-methods systematic review.

Patterson M, Greenley S, Ma Y, Bullock A, Curry J, Smithson J BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024; 13(e3):e515-e527.

PMID: 38557409 PMC: 10850628. DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003492.


CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Gastrostomy in the Palliative Management of Advanced and Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: The Charité Experiences and a Review of the Literature.

Canaz E, Sehouli J, Gebauer B, Segger L, Collettini F, Auer T Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760510 PMC: 10526206. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184540.


Surgical versus non-surgical management for patients with malignant bowel obstruction (S1316): a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial.

Krouse R, Anderson G, Arnold K, Thomson C, Nfonsam V, Al-Kasspooles M Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 8(10):908-918.

PMID: 37541263 PMC: 10530384. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00191-7.


References
1.
Kawata N, Kakushima N, Tanaka M, Sawai H, Imai K, Hagiwara T . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for decompression of malignant bowel obstruction. Dig Endosc. 2013; 26(2):208-13. DOI: 10.1111/den.12139. View

2.
Stellato T, Gauderer M . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for gastrointestinal decompression. Ann Surg. 1987; 205(2):119-22. PMC: 1492828. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198702000-00002. View

3.
McClave S, Ritchie C . The role of endoscopically placed feeding or decompression tubes. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2006; 35(1):83-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2005.12.003. View

4.
Ripamonti C, Mercadante S . How to use octreotide for malignant bowel obstruction. J Support Oncol. 2004; 2(4):357-64. View

5.
Laval G, Arvieux C, Stefani L, Villard M, Mestrallet J, Cardin N . Protocol for the treatment of malignant inoperable bowel obstruction: a prospective study of 80 cases at Grenoble University Hospital Center. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 31(6):502-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.10.009. View