» Articles » PMID: 18789638

Efficacy of Granisetron in the Antiemetic Control of Nonsurgical Intestinal Obstruction in Advanced Cancer: a Phase II Clinical Trial

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2008 Sep 16
PMID 18789638
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess antiemetic efficacy of granisetron in inoperable intestinal obstruction caused by advanced cancer. The study was open, prospective, and multi-centered. We assessed 24 patients (mean age: 61.3 years; 10 males, 14 females) with intestinal obstruction who were refractory to previous antiemetics. Obstruction involved the upper intestine in six patients, the lower intestine in three, and was at multiple levels in 15. Daily treatment included intravenous granisetron (3mg) and dexamethasone (8 mg); nasogastric drainage was not allowed. Subcutaneous haloperidol was available as rescue therapy. A numeric scale was used to evaluate nausea, pain, asthenia, and anorexia at baseline visit and every 24 hours up to the completion of four days of treatment (final visit). Treatment failure was defined as nausea >4 on the numeric scale, vomiting 2/day or more, and rescue therapy with haloperidol at 5mg/day or more. Of the 24 patients, 23 were evaluable for efficacy. Evaluation pre- vs. post-treatment indicated a significant decrease in the severity of nausea (score 6.9 vs. 0.8; P<0.001), number of episodes of vomiting (5.3 vs. 1.0; P<0.001), and abdominal pain (score 4.4 vs. 1.2; P<0.001). Nausea and vomiting control was achieved in 86.9% of patients. Although there was a trend toward greater efficacy in the lower and multiple levels of obstruction, the differences were not statistically significant owing, probably, to small sample size. We conclude that granisetron may be highly efficacious in the control of emesis resulting from intestinal obstruction caused by metastatic cancer, and can be used effectively in patients refractory to other antiemetics.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and benefit of decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG) in advanced cancer patients with malignant bowel obstruction.

Wanzl J, Hofer S, Schwamberger T, Tadic V, Muzalyova A, Hainsch-Muller I Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(11):E1411-E1416.

PMID: 39610950 PMC: 11604304. DOI: 10.1055/a-2458-9919.


Outcomes of patients admitted with malignant small bowel obstruction: a subgroup multicentre observational cohort analysis.

Hupfeld N, Burcharth J, Jensen T, Lolle I, Nielsen L, Tolver M Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):239.

PMID: 39105830 PMC: 11303426. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03436-3.


Development of a Core Outcome Set for the research and assessment of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction.

Bravington A, Obita G, Baddeley E, Johnson M, Murtagh F, Currow D PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0289501.

PMID: 37607197 PMC: 10443874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289501.


The range and suitability of outcome measures used in the assessment of palliative treatment for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: A systematic review.

Bravington A, Obita G, Baddeley E, Johnson M, Murtagh F, Currow D Palliat Med. 2022; 36(9):1336-1350.

PMID: 36131489 PMC: 10150264. DOI: 10.1177/02692163221122352.


MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer.

Madariaga A, Lau J, Ghoshal A, Dzierzanowski T, Larkin P, Sobocki J Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(6):4711-4728.

PMID: 35274188 PMC: 9046338. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06889-8.