» Articles » PMID: 39598853

Effect of Various Thermal Processing Methods on the Sensory, Textural, and Physicochemical Characteristics of Foal Meat

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39598853
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research on the impact of various heat treatment methods on meat has primarily focused on conventional meats from common livestock animals, with limited studies on the effects of different heat treatments on foal meat. The aim of this study was to evaluate how different heat treatments, including sous-vide, affect the sensory, textural, and physicochemical characteristics of foal meat. This allowed for the identification of the most effective heat treatment method to preserve the optimal quality attributes of foal meat while enhancing sensory and textural qualities preferred by consumers. Samples of m. were subjected to traditional cooking in two variants: in water at 100 °C in a foil bag for 1.5 h, and cooked to a core temperature of 85 °C (16 half-carcasses × 2 traditional heat treatment methods = 32 samples). Additionally, m. was subjected to sous-vide at 55 °C and 65 °C for 4 and 24 h (16 half-carcasses × 2 temperature settings × 2 time settings = 64 samples). Chemical composition, physicochemical properties, color parameters, hem pigment levels, texture characteristics, and sensory properties were analyzed. Compared to sous-vide samples, traditionally cooked foal meat exhibited higher weight loss ( = 0.002), higher fat content ( = 0.003), and lower water content ( = 0.03). Significant improvements in tenderness were observed in sous-vide samples, with the lowest shear force values (52.86 N/cm at 55 °C and 48.39 N/cm at 65 °C; = 0.001) and meat hardness (102.44 N and 101.27 N, respectively; = 0.015) after 24 h of thermal processing. Moreover, sous-vide cooking significantly improved sensory properties of foal meat, particularly juiciness ( = 0.002), tenderness ( = 0.002), and flavor desirability ( = 0.03), which were highly rated by consumers.

References
1.
Del Bo C, Simonetti P, Gardana C, Riso P, Lucchini G, Ciappellano S . Horse meat consumption affects iron status, lipid profile and fatty acid composition of red blood cells in healthy volunteers. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2012; 64(2):147-54. DOI: 10.3109/09637486.2012.728198. View

2.
Sujiwo J, Lee S, Kim D, Lee H, Oh S, Jung Y . Physicochemical Features and Volatile Organic Compounds of Horse Loin Subjected to Sous-Vide Cooking. Foods. 2024; 13(2). PMC: 10814590. DOI: 10.3390/foods13020280. View

3.
Hong G, Kim J, Ahn S, Lee C . Changes in Meat Quality Characteristics of the Sous-vide Cooked Chicken Breast during Refrigerated Storage. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2016; 35(6):757-64. PMC: 4726955. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.757. View

4.
Sen A, Naveena B, Muthukumar M, Vaithiyanathan S . Colour, myoglobin denaturation and storage stability of raw and cooked mutton chops at different end point cooking temperature. J Food Sci Technol. 2014; 51(5):970-5. PMC: 4008748. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-011-0557-z. View

5.
Lorenzo J, Sarries M, Franco D . Sex effect on meat quality and carcass traits of foals slaughtered at 15 months of age. Animal. 2013; 7(7):1199-207. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113000189. View