» Articles » PMID: 39540240

Imaging Photoplethysmography (iPPG) in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery: A Novel Technique for Noninvasive Flap Perfusion Monitoring

Overview
Journal Lasers Surg Med
Date 2024 Nov 14
PMID 39540240
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evaluate imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG) as a novel noninvasive technique to assess flap perfusion in head and neck free flap reconstructive (FFR) surgeries.

Methods: Intraoperative iPPG was performed in 17 patients undergoing FFR surgery. Imaging consisted of a 30-s video from which perfusion maps were extracted, providing detailed information about blood flow and pulsatility in the flap microvasculature. During each procedure, iPPG acquisitions were acquired representing distinct perfusion conditions of the flap (fully perfused/ischemic/reperfused). When possible, postoperative measurements were performed to assess flap recovery during the critical time period (3 days) and long-term follow-up (30 days).

Results: Perfusion maps, displaying iPPG amplitude and delay times, correlated strongly (p < 0.001) with the perfusion status of the tissue. One case of postoperative thrombosis, leading to flap failure, was identified with iPPG. After surgical revision in this case, flap perfusion was restored and confirmed by iPPG. Postoperative follow-up imaging allowed for objective visualization of flap recovery short term (3 days) and up to 30 days after the surgical procedure.

Conclusions: This study shows that iPPG is suitable for objective and noninvasive assessment of flap perfusion in head and neck FFR surgery. In addition, postoperative monitoring shows potential for assessing flap perfusion in patients with increased risk of postoperative complications.

References
1.
Kwasnicki R, Noakes A, Banhidy N, Hettiaratchy S . Quantifying the Limitations of Clinical and Technology-based Flap Monitoring Strategies using a Systematic Thematic Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(7):e3663. PMC: 8274739. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003663. View

2.
Chen K, Kuo S, Chien P, Hsieh H, Hsieh C . Comparison of the surgical outcomes of free flap reconstruction for primary and recurrent head and neck cancers: a case-controlled propensity score-matched study of 1,791 free flap reconstructions. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2350. PMC: 7840944. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82034-5. View

3.
Salgado C, Chim H, Schoenoff S, Mardini S . Postoperative care and monitoring of the reconstructed head and neck patient. Semin Plast Surg. 2012; 24(3):281-7. PMC: 3324228. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263069. View

4.
Patel U, Hernandez D, Shnayder Y, Wax M, Hanasono M, Hornig J . Free Flap Reconstruction Monitoring Techniques and Frequency in the Era of Restricted Resident Work Hours. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 143(8):803-809. PMC: 5710561. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0304. View

5.
Wang W . Investigation of reperfusion injury and ischemic preconditioning in microsurgery. Microsurgery. 2008; 29(1):72-9. PMC: 2662723. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20587. View