» Articles » PMID: 23038130

Current Evidence for Postoperative Monitoring of Microvascular Free Flaps: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Ann Plast Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2012 Oct 6
PMID 23038130
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite a plethora of monitoring techniques reported in the literature, only a small number of studies directly address clinical relevant end points, such as the flap salvage rate and false-positive rate.

Method: We conducted a systematic review of current evidence regarding the postoperative monitoring of microvascular free-tissue transfer via extensive electronic and manual search and perusing databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane, American College of Physicians (ACP) Journal Club, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Ovid MEDLINE. The included literature (n = 184 publications) was critically appraised using March 2009 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine definitions, focusing on the evidence for the efficacy of each technique in improving the flap salvage rate of compromised flaps.

Result: There is a paucity of outcome-based studies, with only implanted Doppler probes, near-infrared spectroscopy, laser Doppler flowmetry, quantitative fluorimetry, and digital photography assessment using smartphones having been demonstrated in comparative studies to improve flap salvage rate. Currently, the implantable Doppler probe is the technique with the largest number of comparative studies and case series to demonstrate its effectiveness compared with clinical monitoring.

Conclusions: Future studies need to evaluate the most promising monitoring techniques further with a focus on assessing clinically relevant outcomes, such as the flap salvage rate and the false-positive rate, and not simple clinical series reporting patient and physician satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Inexperienced Evaluator Identification of Hand Ischemia Via Video Processed with Pigment-Enhancing Technology.

Horowitz M, Iskandarova A, Yohe G, Rahman S, Durr N, Giladi A J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025; 7(1):72-78.

PMID: 39991614 PMC: 11846574. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.11.002.


Imaging Photoplethysmography (iPPG) in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery: A Novel Technique for Noninvasive Flap Perfusion Monitoring.

van der Stel S, Lai M, Groen H, Dirven R, Karakullukcu M, Karssemakers L Lasers Surg Med. 2024; 56(10):811-820.

PMID: 39540240 PMC: 11629286. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23859.


Advancing DIEP Flap Monitoring with Optical Imaging Techniques: A Narrative Review.

Kim H, Song I, Cha R Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(14).

PMID: 39065854 PMC: 11280549. DOI: 10.3390/s24144457.


DIY Flap Monitoring: The Glucose Index.

Perez Colman M, Schauvinhold C, Chavanne J, Errea G, Bou M, Ernst G Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(9):e5289.

PMID: 38152706 PMC: 10752491. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005289.


The Impact of Transfer-Related Ischemia on Free Flap Metabolism and Electrolyte Homeostasis-A New In Vivo Experimental Approach in Pigs.

Stephan D, Blatt S, Riedel J, Mohnke K, Ruemmler R, Ziebart A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(20).

PMID: 37892763 PMC: 10607031. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206625.