Accuracy of Wrist-worn Activity Trackers for Measuring Steps in Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Validation Study

Overview

Journal Digit Health

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2024 Nov 6

PMID 39502479

Authors

Zhi Li

Weiyan Feng

Lili Zhou

Shu Gong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Wearable activity trackers provide a simple and objective measurement of postoperative mobilization. However, few have validated the accuracy of trackers in patients after major abdominal surgery.

Objective: To examine the accuracy of wrist-worn activity trackers to measure steps of patients in early mobilization after major abdominal surgery, and to explore the influence of clinical variables and gait parameters on the accuracy of trackers.

Methods: Forty-five patients after major abdominal surgery were recruited to participate in modified six-minute walk tests wearing three trackers simultaneously, the Fitbit Inspire HR, Xiaomi MI 4, and HONOR 5. The differences in displayed steps before and after the walking test were considered as the step counts measured by the trackers; the actual steps taken were determined as the average of the values manually counted by two researchers. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman method, mean percentage error, and mean absolute percentage error were used to assess the accuracy of trackers with reference to manual step counts.

Results: The three trackers undercounted postoperative steps by -65.5% to -23.5%. Analysis showed low-to-good agreement between step counts recorded by trackers and actual steps (ICC = 0.35-0.75); the mean absolute percentage errors ranged from 24.5% to 65.7%. For all trackers, mean absolute percentage errors correlated negatively with postoperative days ( = -0.626 to -0.744), walking speed ( = -0.714 to -0.854), step length ( = -0.466 to -0.615), and cadence ( = -0.681 to -0.790), while there were positive correlations between mean absolute percentage errors and the number of abdominal drains ( = 0.450-0.514).

Conclusions: The specific activity trackers used in this study might not be reliable tools for measuring steps counts during the walking test in the early postoperative period for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

References

Hartung V, Sarshar M, Karle V, Shammas L, Rashid A, Roullier P . Validity of Consumer Activity Monitors and an Algorithm Using Smartphone Data for Measuring Steps during Different Activity Types. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(24). PMC: 7764011. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249314. View

Tang J, Wang B, Chow J, Joseph P, Chan J, Abdul Rahman N . Improving postoperative mobilisation rates in patients undergoing elective major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Postgrad Med J. 2020; 97(1146):239-247. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138650. View

Staiger R, Gerns E, Castrejon Subira M, Domenghino A, Puhan M, Clavien P . Can Early Postoperative Complications Predict High Morbidity and Decrease Failure to Rescue Following Major Abdominal Surgery?. Ann Surg. 2020; 272(5):834-839. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004254. View

Yip V, Dunne D, Samuels S, Tan C, Lacasia C, Tang J . Adherence to early mobilisation: Key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42(10):1561-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.015. View

Velickovic J, Feng C, Palibrk I, Velickovic D, Jovanovic B, Bumbasirevic V . The Assessment of Complications After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comparison of Two Scales. J Surg Res. 2019; 247:397-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.003. View

Alinia P, Cain C, Fallahzadeh R, Shahrokni A, Cook D, Ghasemzadeh H . How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(8):e106. PMC: 5572056. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.6321. View

Wolk S, Linke S, Bogner A, Sturm D, Meissner T, Mussle B . Use of Activity Tracking in Major Visceral Surgery-the Enhanced Perioperative Mobilization Trial: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 23(6):1218-1226. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3998-0. View

Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon K . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152(3):292-298. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. View

Low C, Bovbjerg D, Ahrendt S, Choudry M, Holtzman M, Jones H . Fitbit step counts during inpatient recovery from cancer surgery as a predictor of readmission. Ann Behav Med. 2018; 52(1):88-92. PMC: 6051699. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kax022. View

10.

Carmichael H, Overbey D, Hosokawa P, Goode C, Jones T, Barnett Jr C . Wearable Technology-A Pilot Study to Define "Normal" Postoperative Recovery Trajectories. J Surg Res. 2019; 244:368-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.057. View

11.

Chow J, Thom J, Wewege M, Ward R, Parmenter B . Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site. Gait Posture. 2017; 57:199-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.012. View

12.

Wolk S, Distler M, Mussle B, Sothje S, Weitz J, Welsch T . Adherence to ERAS elements in major visceral surgery-an observational pilot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016; 401(3):349-56. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1407-2. View

13.

Rosenberg D, Kadokura E, Bouldin E, Miyawaki C, Higano C, Hartzler A . Acceptability of Fitbit for physical activity tracking within clinical care among men with prostate cancer. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017; 2016:1050-1059. PMC: 5333209. View

14.

Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Troosters T . How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness?. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005; 12(2):102-14. DOI: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000161551.73095.9c. View

15.

van Zelm R, Coeckelberghs E, Sermeus W, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Weimann A, Seys D . Variation in care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: protocol adherence in 12 European hospitals. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017; 32(10):1471-1478. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2863-z. View

16.

Hughes M, Hackney R, Lamb P, Wigmore S, Deans D, Skipworth R . Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019; 43(7):1661-1668. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-04950-y. View

17.

Wong C, Mentis H, Kuber R . The bit doesn't fit: Evaluation of a commercial activity-tracker at slower walking speeds. Gait Posture. 2017; 59:177-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.010. View

18.

Daskivich T, Houman J, Lopez M, Luu M, Fleshner P, Zaghiyan K . Association of Wearable Activity Monitors With Assessment of Daily Ambulation and Length of Stay Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(2):e187673. PMC: 6484591. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7673. View

19.

Schaffer S, Holzapfel S, Fulk G, Bosch P . Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017; 33(10):788-796. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1354412. View

20.

Moriello C, Mayo N, Feldman L, Carli F . Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(6):1083-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.031. View