» Articles » PMID: 15785295

How to Assess Physical Activity? How to Assess Physical Fitness?

Overview
Date 2005 Mar 24
PMID 15785295
Citations 134
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regular aerobic physical activity (PA) increases exercise capacity and physical fitness (PF), which can lead to many health benefits. Accurate quantification of PA and PF becomes essential in terms of health outcome and effectiveness of intervention programmes. In this manuscript we present a review regarding the assessment of physical activity and fitness. Three types of PA assessment methods can be distinguished: criterion methods, objective methods and subjective methods. Criterion methods like doubly labelled water, indirect calorimetry and direct observation are the most reliable and valid measurements against which all other PA assessments methods should be validated, but they also hold important drawbacks. Objective PA assessment methods include activity monitors (pedometers and accelerometers) and heart rate monitoring. Finally, questionnaires and activity diaries are considered subjective methods. For the assessment of PF, we distinguish field tests and laboratory tests. The Eurofit for Adults is a test battery that is designed to assess health-related fitness of individuals, communities, sub-populations and populations. It is mainly used for evaluating the morphological component, the muscular component, the motor component and the cardio-respiratory component. In the laboratory, exercise capacity is preferentially assessed through maximal incremental exercise testing. Cardio-pulmonary exercise testing is a well-established procedure that provides a wealth of clinically diagnostic and prognostic information. The peak oxygen uptake is the gold standard in the assessment of exercise tolerance. When maximal exercise is contraindicated or not achievable, the VAT or the submaximal slopes provide reasonable alternatives.

Citing Articles

One-minute sit-to-stand test: Reference values for the Chilean population.

Otto-Yanez M, Torres-Castro R, Barros-Poblete M, Barros M, Valencia C, Campos A PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317594.

PMID: 39879255 PMC: 11778653. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317594.


Analysis of Physical Activity Using Wearable Health Technology in US Adults Enrolled in the All of Us Research Program: Multiyear Observational Study.

Singh R, Tetrick M, Fisher J, Washington P, Yu J, Paskett E J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e65095.

PMID: 39658010 PMC: 11668988. DOI: 10.2196/65095.


Accuracy of wrist-worn activity trackers for measuring steps in patients after major abdominal surgery: A validation study.

Li Z, Feng W, Zhou L, Gong S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241297036.

PMID: 39502479 PMC: 11536558. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241297036.


Analysis of multi-level barriers to physical activity among nursing students using regularized regression.

Capan M, Bigelow L, Kathuria Y, Paluch A, Chung J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0304214.

PMID: 38787846 PMC: 11125535. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304214.


Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity, Fitness and Indicators of Cardiometabolic Risk among Rural Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study at 15-Year Follow-up of the MINIMat Cohort.

Islam M, Nystrom C, Kippler M, Kajantie E, Lof M, Rahman S J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024; 14(3):987-1003.

PMID: 38771489 PMC: 11442897. DOI: 10.1007/s44197-024-00245-1.