» Articles » PMID: 39444712

Methane Emissions and Rumen Microbiome Response During Compensatory Growth on Either a Forage or Grain-based Finishing Diet in Beef Cattle

Overview
Journal Transl Anim Sci
Date 2024 Oct 24
PMID 39444712
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of the level of prior nutritional restriction during backgrounding in Angus steers on methane (CH) emissions, diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, and ruminal microbiome under either a forage or grain-based finishing diet. Eighty steers (body weight [BW]: 444 ± 39 kg, age: 18 ± 1 mo) were blocked and randomly assigned within the block to either an (0.6 to 0.7 kg/d) or (0.3 to 0.4 kg/d) growth rate to exploit compensatory growth (CG), during 97 d of backgrounding. Following, for 84 d, half of the steers in each group were finished on a diet while the other half were finished on a -based diet. During the backgrounding period, CH emissions tended ( ≤ 0.07) to be higher; however, CH intensity expressed by BW gain was 50% lower ( < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal growth steers. BW gain, dry matter intake, diet digestibility, and ammonia nitrogen in the rumen were greater ( < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal steers. During the finishing period, CH emissions in either forage or grain finishing diets were similar ( > 0.05) for both backgrounding treatments. However, due to greater BW gain in suboptimal steers (1.20 vs. 0.97 kg/d), their CH intensity-related coefficient decreased ( < 0.05) during the finishing period. Diet digestibility or any fermentation parameter was unaffected ( > 0.05) by previous backgrounding during the finishing period. In fact, rumen microbial abundance measured during finishing was not modified ( > 0.05) by previous backgrounding. Steers finished under grain conditions, had lower ( < 0.01) daily CH emissions and CH intensity. Additionally, grain-fed steers increased ( < 0.05) BW gain, diet digestibility, propionic, lactic, and valeric acids, family and , , , and bacteria genera, compared to forage-fed steers. In conclusion, ruminal microbiome and fermentation, diet digestibility, and CH emissions were unaffected during finishing between prior levels of backgrounding growth. However, given the higher BW gain in suboptimal steers in both finishing diets, CH intensity was reduced in comparison to the optimal backgrounded steers. Nevertheless, lifetime emissions of the steers need to be assessed with the different dietary regimens, since suboptimal steers reduced CH emissions during the backgrounding period but, additional days of finishing were required to achieve the same BW as their contemporaries.

References
1.
Smith P, Waters S, Kenny D, Kirwan S, Conroy S, Kelly A . Effect of divergence in residual methane emissions on feed intake and efficiency, growth and carcass performance, and indices of rumen fermentation and methane emissions in finishing beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2021; 99(11). PMC: 8598385. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab275. View

2.
Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen P . Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:14567. PMC: 4598811. DOI: 10.1038/srep14567. View

3.
Arndt C, Hristov A, Price W, McClelland S, Pelaez A, Cueva S . Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5 °C target by 2030 but not 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(20):e2111294119. PMC: 9171756. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2111294119. View

4.
Dini Y, Cajarville C, Gere J, Fernandez S, Fraga M, Pravia M . Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers. Transl Anim Sci. 2020; 3(1):239-246. PMC: 7200529. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txy111. View

5.
Choat W, Krehbiel C, Duff G, Kirksey R, Lauriault L, Rivera J . Influence of grazing dormant native range or winter wheat pasture on subsequent finishing cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and ruminal metabolism. J Anim Sci. 2003; 81(12):3191-201. DOI: 10.2527/2003.81123191x. View