» Articles » PMID: 35572638

Differences in the Composition of the Rumen Microbiota of Finishing Beef Cattle Divergently Ranked for Residual Methane Emissions

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 May 16
PMID 35572638
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the advent of high throughput technology, it is now feasible to study the complex relationship of the rumen microbiota with methanogenesis in large populations of ruminant livestock divergently ranked for enteric emissions. Recently, the residual methane emissions (RME) concept has been identified as the optimal phenotype for assessing the methanogenic potential of ruminant livestock due to the trait's independence from animal productivity but strong correlation with daily methane emissions. However, there is currently a dearth of data available on the bacterial and archaeal microbial communities residing in the rumens of animals divergently ranked for RME. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the rumen microbiota and RME in a population of finishing beef cattle. Methane emissions were estimated from individual animals using the GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring system for 21 days over a mean feed intake measurement period of 91 days. Residual methane emissions were calculated for 282 crossbred finishing beef cattle, following which a ∼30% difference in all expressions of methane emissions was observed between high and low RME ranked animals. Rumen fluid samples were successfully obtained from 268 animals during the final week of the methane measurement period using a trans-oesophageal sampling device. Rumen microbial DNA was extracted and subjected to 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Animals ranked as low RME had the highest relative abundances ( < 0.05) of lactic-acid-producing bacteria (, , and ) and , and the lowest ( < 0.05) proportions of , , and . Within the rumen methanogen community, an increased abundance ( < 0.05) of the genus and RO clade was observed in low RME animals. The relative abundances of both and were negatively correlated ( < 0.05) with RME and positively correlated with ruminal propionate. A similar relationship was observed for the abundance of and the RO clade. Findings from this study highlight the ruminal abundance of bacterial genera associated with the synthesis of propionate the acrylate pathway, as well as the methanogens and members of the RO clade as potential microbial biomarkers of the methanogenic potential of beef cattle.

Citing Articles

Sex-Induced Changes in Microbial Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes in Gastrointestinal Tract of Simmental Cattle.

Rojas D, Estrada R, Romero Y, Figueroa D, Quilcate C, Ganoza-Roncal J Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596887 PMC: 11591695. DOI: 10.3390/biology13110932.


Assessing the Risk of Spreading and Its Toxins Within the Dairy Farm.

Filippova V, Ilina L, Yildirim E, Ponomareva E, Kluchnikova I, Dubrovin A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518870 PMC: 11545040. DOI: 10.3390/ani14213148.


Application of propionate-producing bacterial consortium in ruminal methanogenesis inhibited environment with bromoethanesulfonate as a methanogen direct inhibitor.

Jeong J, Yu C, Kang R, Kim M, Park T Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1422474.

PMID: 39444738 PMC: 11497462. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1422474.


Methane emissions and rumen microbiome response during compensatory growth on either a forage or grain-based finishing diet in beef cattle.

Clariget J, Banchero G, Ciganda V, Santander D, Keogh K, Smith P Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txae143.

PMID: 39444712 PMC: 11497622. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae143.


Integrating genome- and transcriptome-wide association studies to uncover the host-microbiome interactions in bovine rumen methanogenesis.

Wang W, Wei Z, Li Z, Ren J, Song Y, Xu J Imeta. 2024; 3(5):e234.

PMID: 39429883 PMC: 11487568. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.234.


References
1.
de Haas Y, Pszczola M, Soyeurt H, Wall E, Lassen J . Invited review: Phenotypes to genetically reduce greenhouse gas emissions in dairying. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 100(2):855-870. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11246. View

2.
Smith P, Waters S, Kenny D, Boland T, Heffernan J, Kelly A . Replacing Barley and Soybean Meal With By-products, in a Pasture Based Diet, Alters Daily Methane Output and the Rumen Microbial Community Using the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC). Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:1614. PMC: 7387412. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01614. View

3.
Morgavi D, Forano E, Martin C, Newbold C . Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal. 2012; 4(7):1024-36. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110000546. View

4.
Manzanilla-Pech C, de Haas Y, Hayes B, Veerkamp R, Khansefid M, Donoghue K . Genomewide association study of methane emissions in Angus beef cattle with validation in dairy cattle. J Anim Sci. 2016; 94(10):4151-4166. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0431. View

5.
Difford G, Plichta D, Lovendahl P, Lassen J, Noel S, Hojberg O . Host genetics and the rumen microbiome jointly associate with methane emissions in dairy cows. PLoS Genet. 2018; 14(10):e1007580. PMC: 6200390. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007580. View