» Articles » PMID: 34745024

Effect of Divergent Feeding Regimes During Early Life on the Rumen Microbiota in Calves

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Nov 8
PMID 34745024
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether divergent feeding regimes during the first 41 weeks of the life of a calf are associated with long-term changes in the rumen microbiota and the associated fermentation end-products. Twenty-four calves (9 ± 5 days of age) were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design with two divergent treatments across three dietary phases. In phase 1 (P01), calves were offered a low-milk volume/concentrate starter diet with early weaning (CO) or high-milk volume/pasture diet and late weaning (FO). In phase 2 (P02), calves from both groups were randomly allocated to either high-quality (HQ) or low-quality (LQ) pasture grazing groups. In phase 3 (P03), calves were randomly allocated to one of two grazing groups and offered the same pasture-only diet. During each dietary phase, methane (CH) and hydrogen (H) emissions and dry matter intake (DMI) were measured in respiration chambers, and rumen samples for the evaluation of microbiota and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) characterizations were collected. In P01, CO calves had a higher solid feed intake but a lower CH yield (yCH) and acetate:propionate ratio (A:P) compared with FO calves. The ruminal bacterial community had lower proportions of cellulolytic bacteria in CO than FO calves. The archaeal community was dominated by in CO calves and by in FO calves. These differences, however, did not persist into P02. Calves offered HQ pastures had greater DMI and lower A:P ratio than calves offered LQ pastures, but yCH was similar between groups. The cellulolytic bacteria had lower proportions in HQ than LQ calves. In all groups, the archaeal community was dominated by . No treatment interactions were observed in P02. In P03, all calves had similar DMI, CH and H emissions, SCFA proportions, and microbial compositions, and no interactions with previous treatments were observed. These results indicate that the rumen microbiota and associated fermentation end-products are driven by the diet consumed at the time of sampling and that previous dietary interventions do not lead to a detectable long-term microbial imprint or changes in rumen function.

Citing Articles

Methane emissions and rumen microbiome response during compensatory growth on either a forage or grain-based finishing diet in beef cattle.

Clariget J, Banchero G, Ciganda V, Santander D, Keogh K, Smith P Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txae143.

PMID: 39444712 PMC: 11497622. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae143.


Changes in the rumen development, rumen fermentation, and rumen microbiota community in weaned calves during steviol glycosides treatment.

Wang K, Jiang M, Chen Y, Huang Y, Cheng Z, Datsomor O Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1395665.

PMID: 38979539 PMC: 11228177. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1395665.


Fecal Microbial Communities of Nellore and Crossbred Beef Calves Raised at Pasture.

Bessegatto J, Lisboa J, Santos B, Curti J, Montemor C, Alfieri A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 38791664 PMC: 11117347. DOI: 10.3390/ani14101447.


Effects of different forage proportions in fermented total mixed ration on muscle fatty acid profile and rumen microbiota in lambs.

Liu M, Wang Z, Sun L, Wang Y, Li J, Ge G Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1197059.

PMID: 37520349 PMC: 10374311. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1197059.


Long-term effects of early-life rumen microbiota modulation on dairy cow production performance and methane emissions.

Huuki H, Tapio M, Mantysaari P, Negussie E, Ahvenjarvi S, Vilkki J Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:983823.

PMID: 36425044 PMC: 9679419. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.983823.


References
1.
Borrel G, Harris H, Tottey W, Mihajlovski A, Parisot N, Peyretaillade E . Genome sequence of "Candidatus Methanomethylophilus alvus" Mx1201, a methanogenic archaeon from the human gut belonging to a seventh order of methanogens. J Bacteriol. 2012; 194(24):6944-5. PMC: 3510639. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01867-12. View

2.
Kittelmann S, Seedorf H, Walters W, Clemente J, Knight R, Gordon J . Simultaneous amplicon sequencing to explore co-occurrence patterns of bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic microorganisms in rumen microbial communities. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e47879. PMC: 3568148. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047879. View

3.
Li R, Connor E, Li C, Baldwin Vi R, Sparks M . Characterization of the rumen microbiota of pre-ruminant calves using metagenomic tools. Environ Microbiol. 2011; 14(1):129-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02543.x. View

4.
Belanche A, Kingston-Smith A, Griffith G, Newbold C . A Multi-Kingdom Study Reveals the Plasticity of the Rumen Microbiota in Response to a Shift From Non-grazing to Grazing Diets in Sheep. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10:122. PMC: 6396721. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00122. View

5.
Malmuthuge N, Griebel P . Fetal environment and fetal intestine are sterile during the third trimester of pregnancy. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2018; 204:59-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2018.09.005. View