» Articles » PMID: 39441853

Moving Towards a Core Measures Set for Patient Safety in Perioperative Care: An E-Delphi Consensus Study

Abstract

A Core Measures Set (CMS) is an agreed standardized group of measures that should be assessed and reported in research for a specific condition or clinical area. This study undertook the development of a CMS for Patient Safety through a two-round, web-based Delphi consensus approach, in the context of the "Improving quality and patient SAFEty in surgical care through STandardisation and harmonization of perioperative care in Europe" (SAFEST) project-a collaborative, patient-centered and evidence-based European Union-funded project that aims to generate action-oriented evidence in perioperative care. We developed an Initial List of Measures via an umbrella review following the deployment of an e-Delphi method with an inclusive panel of experts to prioritize measures towards a consensualized Final List of Measures. All measures were rigorously assessed for both importance and feasibility. After the two rounds of the e-Delphi consensus method we observed 13 preoperative measures (40.6% of the initial number), 24 intraoperative measures (66.7%), 25 postoperative measures (20.3%) and 23 mixed period measures (41.1%) met consensus criteria for both importance and feasibility. Higher scores were detected in importance ratings compared to feasibility across all groups of measures. Importantly, numeric averages regarding pain-related measures differed in the assessment of patients when compared to that of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs). This work not only informs future SAFEST iterations but also sets a precedent for research into valid, patient-centered, and action-oriented perioperative safety measures.

Citing Articles

Correction: Moving towards a core measures set for patient safety in perioperative care: An e-Delphi consensus study.

Dinis-Teixeira J, Nunes A, Leite A, Schafer W, Valli C, Martinez-Nicolas I PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317063.

PMID: 39746078 PMC: 11694956. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317063.

References
1.
Cheung C, Zebrack B . What do adolescents and young adults want from cancer resources? Insights from a Delphi panel of AYA patients. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 25(1):119-126. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3396-7. View

2.
Sokol D . "First do no harm" revisited. BMJ. 2013; 347:f6426. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6426. View

3.
Pearse R, Moreno R, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C . Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 2012; 380(9847):1059-65. PMC: 3493988. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9. View

4.
De Vries E, Prins H, Crolla R, den Outer A, van Andel G, van Helden S . Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(20):1928-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0911535. View

5.
Norburn L, Thomas L . Expertise, experience, and excellence. Twenty years of patient involvement in health technology assessment at NICE: an evolving story. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020; 37:e15. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462320000860. View