Mortality After Surgery in Europe: a 7 Day Cohort Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Clinical outcomes after major surgery are poorly described at the national level. Evidence of heterogeneity between hospitals and health-care systems suggests potential to improve care for patients but this potential remains unconfirmed. The European Surgical Outcomes Study was an international study designed to assess outcomes after non-cardiac surgery in Europe.
Methods: We did this 7 day cohort study between April 4 and April 11, 2011. We collected data describing consecutive patients aged 16 years and older undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery in 498 hospitals across 28 European nations. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 60 days. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were duration of hospital stay and admission to critical care. We used χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests to compare categorical variables and the t test or the Mann-Whitney U test to compare continuous variables. Significance was set at p<0·05. We constructed multilevel logistic regression models to adjust for the differences in mortality rates between countries.
Findings: We included 46,539 patients, of whom 1855 (4%) died before hospital discharge. 3599 (8%) patients were admitted to critical care after surgery with a median length of stay of 1·2 days (IQR 0·9-3·6). 1358 (73%) patients who died were not admitted to critical care at any stage after surgery. Crude mortality rates varied widely between countries (from 1·2% [95% CI 0·0-3·0] for Iceland to 21·5% [16·9-26·2] for Latvia). After adjustment for confounding variables, important differences remained between countries when compared with the UK, the country with the largest dataset (OR range from 0·44 [95% CI 0·19-1·05; p=0·06] for Finland to 6·92 [2·37-20·27; p=0·0004] for Poland).
Interpretation: The mortality rate for patients undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery was higher than anticipated. Variations in mortality between countries suggest the need for national and international strategies to improve care for this group of patients.
Funding: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Society of Anaesthesiology.
Sousa D, Magalhaes A, Fonseca D, Braga A Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78254.
PMID: 40026974 PMC: 11872006. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78254.
Transforming in-clinic post-operative and intermediate care with cosinuss°.
Zellhuber I, Schade M, Adams T, Blobner M, Weber M, Bubb C Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025; 24:630-638.
PMID: 39963547 PMC: 11832005. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.10.002.
Big data in anaesthesia: a narrative, nonsystematic review.
Dony P, Florquin R, Forget P Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2025; 2(5):e0032.
PMID: 39916808 PMC: 11783644. DOI: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000032.
Kitua D, Khamisi R, Salim M, Kategile A, Mwanga A, Kivuyo N Surg Pract Sci. 2025; 11():100135.
PMID: 39845160 PMC: 11749966. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100135.
Homsy M, Dale-Gandar J, Schwarz S, Flexman A, MacDonell S Can J Anaesth. 2024; 71(12):1653-1663.
PMID: 39704980 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-024-02884-1.