» Articles » PMID: 39428880

Inducing Representational Change in the Hippocampus Through Real-time Neurofeedback

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Oct 21
PMID 39428880
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When you perceive or remember something, other related things come to mind, affecting how these competing items are subsequently perceived and remembered. Such behavioural consequences are believed to result from changes in the overlap of neural representations of these items, especially in the hippocampus. According to multiple theories, hippocampal overlap should increase (integration) when there is high coactivation between cortical representations. However, prior studies used indirect proxies for coactivation by manipulating stimulus similarity or task demands. Here, we induce coactivation in visual cortex more directly using closed-loop neurofeedback from real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). While viewing one object, participants were rewarded for activating the representation of another object as strongly as possible. Across multiple real-time fMRI sessions, participants succeeded in using this neurofeedback to increase coactivation. Compared with a baseline of untrained objects, this protocol led to memory integration in behaviour and the brain: the trained objects became harder for participants to discriminate behaviourally in a categorical perception task and harder to discriminate neurally from patterns of fMRI activity in their hippocampus as a result of losing unique features. These findings demonstrate that neurofeedback can be used to alter and combine memories.This article is part of the theme issue 'Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation'.

Citing Articles

Sculpting new visual categories into the human brain.

Iordan C, Ritvo V, Norman K, Turk-Browne N, Cohen J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(50):e2410445121.

PMID: 39625982 PMC: 11648923. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410445121.


Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation.

Sulzer J, Papageorgiou T, Goebel R, Hendler T Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1915):20230081.

PMID: 39428881 PMC: 11491839. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0081.


Inducing representational change in the hippocampus through real-time neurofeedback.

Peng K, Wammes J, Nguyen A, Iordan C, Norman K, Turk-Browne N Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1915):20230091.

PMID: 39428880 PMC: 11491844. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0091.

References
1.
Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J . Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016; 18(2):86-100. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164. View

2.
Reuter M, Schmansky N, Rosas H, Fischl B . Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(4):1402-18. PMC: 3389460. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084. View

3.
Milivojevic B, Vicente-Grabovetsky A, Doeller C . Insight reconfigures hippocampal-prefrontal memories. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(7):821-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.033. View

4.
Favila S, Chanales A, Kuhl B . Experience-dependent hippocampal pattern differentiation prevents interference during subsequent learning. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11066. PMC: 4820837. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11066. View

5.
Oakes T, Johnstone T, Ores Walsh K, Greischar L, Alexander A, Fox A . Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools. Neuroimage. 2005; 28(3):529-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.058. View