Sources of Discrepancy Between Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Bruch's Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Width Thickness in Eyes with Glaucoma

Overview

Journal Ophthalmol Sci

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2024 Oct 16

PMID 39411541

Authors

Iris Zhuang

Maryam Ashrafkhorasani

Vahid Mohammadzadeh

Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the discrepancies between circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) thickness in glaucoma eyes.

Design: A cross-sectional observational study.

Subjects: One hundred eighty-six eyes (118 patients) with glaucoma.

Methods: OCT optic nerve head volume scans of patients enrolled in the Advanced Glaucoma Progression Study at the final available visit were exported. The RNFL and BMO-MRW measurements were averaged into corresponding 7.5° sectors, and the nasal sector data were excluded from analyses. A 2-stage screening process was used to identify true mismatches between the RNFL and BMO-MRW measurements, in which either the RNFL or BMO-MRW value was in the less than first percentile range while its counterpart was in the greater than first percentile range on the temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal curve. The prevalence of these mismatches was mapped, and corresponding images were reviewed to determine the underlying cause of these discrepancies.

Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of mismatches between RNFL and BMO-MRW, location of mismatches between RNFL and BMO-MRW, anatomical causes of mismatches between RNFL and BMO-MRW.

Results: Mismatch analysis revealed true mismatches between RNFL and BMO-MRW in 7.7% of sectors. High BMO-MRW with low corresponding RNFL mismatches were most frequently located at the 45° and 322.5° sectors, whereas high RNFL with corresponding low BMO-MRW mismatches peaked at the 75° sector. Large blood vessels accounted for 90.9% of high RNFL with low BMO-MRW mismatches. Small to large blood vessels accounted for 62.9% of high BMO-MRW with low RNFL mismatches; the remaining mismatches could be attributed to retinoschisis or inclusion of outer retinal layers in BMO-MRW measurements.

Conclusions: Although overall agreement between RNFL and BMO-MRW measurements is good in areas with advanced damage, blood vessels and other anatomical factors can cause discrepancies between the 2 types of structural measurements and need to be considered when evaluating the utility of such measurements for detection of change.

Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

References

Wu Z, Vianna J, Reis A, Zemborain Z, Lee S, Thenappan A . Qualitative evaluation of neuroretinal rim and retinal nerve fibre layer on optical coherence tomography to detect glaucomatous damage. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019; 104(7):980-984. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314611. View

Schuman J, Hee M, Puliafito C, Wong C, Lin C, Hertzmark E . Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113(5):586-96. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100050054031. View

Gmeiner J, Schrems W, Mardin C, Laemmer R, Kruse F, Schrems-Hoesl L . Comparison of Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width and Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Early Glaucoma Assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57(9):OCT575-84. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18906. View

Yang H, Rees J, Sanchez F, Gardiner S, Mansberger S . OCT Segmentation Errors with Bruch's Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Width as Compared with Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023; 7(3):308-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.12.002. View

Hood D, Salant J, Arthur S, Ritch R, Liebmann J . The location of the inferior and superior temporal blood vessels and interindividual variability of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. J Glaucoma. 2009; 19(3):158-66. PMC: 2889235. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181af31ec. View

Resch H, Pereira I, Weber S, Holzer S, Fischer G, Vass C . Retinal Blood Vessel Distribution Correlates With the Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Profile as Measured With GDx VCC and ECC. J Glaucoma. 2015; 24(5):389-95. PMC: 4450913. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000237. View

Shi L, Mohammadi M, Mohammadzadeh V, Su E, Weiss R, Caprioli J . Comparing Rates of Change in Moderate to Advanced Glaucoma: Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Versus Bruch Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Width. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023; 253:181-188. PMC: 10859221. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.05.003. View

Chauhan B, Danthurebandara V, Sharpe G, Demirel S, Girkin C, Mardin C . Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in a Normal White Population: A Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(9):1786-94. PMC: 4698808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.001. View

Kromer R, Spitzer M . Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width Measurement with SD-OCT: A Method to Correct for the Opening Size of Bruch's Membrane. J Ophthalmol. 2017; 2017:8963267. PMC: 5651162. DOI: 10.1155/2017/8963267. View

10.

Park K, Kim J, Lee J . The Relationship Between Bruch's Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Width and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and a New Index Using a Neural Network. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018; 7(4):14. PMC: 6108532. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.7.4.14. View

11.

Reis A, OLeary N, Yang H, Sharpe G, Nicolela M, Burgoyne C . Influence of clinically invisible, but optical coherence tomography detected, optic disc margin anatomy on neuroretinal rim evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(4):1852-60. PMC: 3995560. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-9309. View

12.

La Bruna S, Tsamis E, Zemborain Z, Wu Z, De Moraes C, Ritch R . A Topographic Comparison of OCT Minimum Rim Width (BMO-MRW) and Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (cRNFL) Thickness Measures in Eyes With or Suspected Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2020; 29(8):671-680. PMC: 8864542. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001571. View

13.

Bayer A, Akman A . Artifacts and Anatomic Variations in Optical Coherence Tomography. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2020; 50(2):99-106. PMC: 7204899. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.78000. View

14.

Wessel J, Horn F, Tornow R, Schmid M, Mardin C, Kruse F . Longitudinal analysis of progression in glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(5):3613-20. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9786. View

15.

Hood D, Fortune B, Arthur S, Xing D, Salant J, Ritch R . Blood vessel contributions to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness profiles measured with optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2008; 17(7):519-28. PMC: 2987575. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181629a02. View

16.

Amini N, Daneshvar R, Sharifipour F, Romero P, Henry S, Caprioli J . Structure-Function Relationships in Perimetric Glaucoma: Comparison of Minimum-Rim Width and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58(11):4623-4631. PMC: 5596793. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21936. View

17.

Chauhan B, OLeary N, Almobarak F, Reis A, Yang H, Sharpe G . Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology. 2012; 120(3):535-543. PMC: 3667974. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.055. View

18.

Hammel N, Belghith A, Weinreb R, Medeiros F, Mendoza N, Zangwill L . Comparing the Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Loss in Healthy Eyes and in Glaucoma Eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017; 178:38-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.008. View

19.

Torres L, Sharpe G, Hutchison D, Zangalli C, Burk R, Reis A . Influence of Bruch's Membrane Opening Area in Diagnosing Glaucoma With Neuroretinal Parameters From Optical Coherence Tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019; 208:94-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.009. View