Understanding Inter-individual Variability of Experimental Pain Habituation and Conditioned Pain Modulation in Healthy Individuals

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Sep 27

PMID 39333624

Authors

Iara De Schoenmacker

Paulina S Scheuren

Laura Sirucek

Robin Lutolf

Lindsay M Gorrell

Jan Rosner

Armin Curt

Petra Schweinhardt

Michele Hubli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although reduced experimental pain habituation is proposed as a proxy of diminished endogenous pain modulatory capacity in chronic pain, prior studies show contradictory findings. Even across healthy participants, pain habituation varies substantially, which may relate to another measure of endogenous pain modulation, i.e., conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Hence, this study investigated the relationship between pain habituation and CPM. Pain habituation was assessed in 45 healthy participants between two blocks of 15-20 contact-heat stimuli applied to the hand. Habituation of subjective pain ratings and objective neurophysiological readouts (contact-heat evoked potential (CHEP) and palmar sympathetic skin response (SSR)) was investigated. CPM was assessed by comparing heat pain thresholds before and after hand immersion in a noxious cold (9 °C) and lukewarm water bath (32 °C, to control for repeated measures effects). Pain habituation showed a large variability, with subjective but not objective pain habituation correlating with cold-induced CPM effects (r = 0.50; p = 0.025). This correlation was not observed for 'true' CPM effects (corrected for repeated measures effects) nor for CPM effects induced by a lukewarm water bath. These findings suggest that the observed variability in subjective pain habituation may be influenced by both descending endogenous pain modulation and peripheral adaptation processes associated with repeated measures. Objective pain habituation readouts, i.e., CHEPs and SSRs, capture different, complementary aspects of endogenous pain modulation.

References

Rainville P, Duncan G, Price D, Carrier B, Bushnell M . Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science. 1997; 277(5328):968-71. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5328.968. View

Vogt B . Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6(7):533-44. PMC: 2659949. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1704. View

Bingel U, Schoell E, Herken W, Buchel C, May A . Habituation to painful stimulation involves the antinociceptive system. Pain. 2007; 131(1-2):21-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.005. View

van der Miesen M, Joosten E, Kaas A, Linden D, Peters J, Vossen C . Habituation to pain: self-report, electroencephalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy individuals. A scoping review and future recommendations. Pain. 2023; 165(3):500-522. PMC: 10859850. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003052. View

Kramer J, Haefeli J, Jutzeler C, Steeves J, Curt A . Improving the acquisition of nociceptive evoked potentials without causing more pain. Pain. 2012; 154(2):235-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.027. View

Nijs J, Torres-Cueco R, van Wilgen C, Girbes E, Struyf F, Roussel N . Applying modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: criteria for the classification of central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2014; 17(5):447-57. View

Lutolf R, Rosner J, Curt A, Hubli M . Indicators of central sensitization in chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. Eur J Pain. 2022; 26(10):2162-2175. PMC: 9826442. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2028. View

Schaible H . Peripheral and central mechanisms of pain generation. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006; (177):3-28. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-33823-9_1. View

Kennedy D, Kemp H, Wu C, Ridout D, Rice A . Determining Real Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Repeated Measures Study in Healthy Volunteers. J Pain. 2019; 21(5-6):708-721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.09.010. View

10.

Lutolf R, De Schoenmacker I, Rosner J, Sirucek L, Schweinhardt P, Curt A . Anti- and Pro-Nociceptive mechanisms in neuropathic pain after human spinal cord injury. Eur J Pain. 2022; 26(10):2176-2187. PMC: 9826499. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2029. View

11.

Sava S, de Pasqua V, de Noordhout A, Schoenen J . Visually induced analgesia during face or limb stimulation in healthy and migraine subjects. J Pain Res. 2018; 11:1821-1828. PMC: 6140700. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S160276. View

12.

Beissner F, Meissner K, Bar K, Napadow V . The autonomic brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(25):10503-11. PMC: 3685840. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1103-13.2013. View

13.

Weissman-Fogel I, Granovsky Y, Bar-Shalita T . Sensory Over-Responsiveness among Healthy Subjects is Associated with a Pronociceptive State. Pain Pract. 2017; 18(4):473-486. DOI: 10.1111/papr.12619. View

14.

Edwards R, Smith M, Stonerock G, Haythornthwaite J . Pain-related catastrophizing in healthy women is associated with greater temporal summation of and reduced habituation to thermal pain. Clin J Pain. 2006; 22(8):730-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210914.72794.bc. View

15.

Granovsky Y, Anand P, Nakae A, Nascimento O, Smith B, Sprecher E . Normative data for Aδ contact heat evoked potentials in adult population: a multicenter study. Pain. 2016; 157(5):1156-1163. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000495. View

16.

De Schoenmacker I, Berry C, Blouin J, Rosner J, Hubli M, Jutzeler C . An intensity matched comparison of laser- and contact heat evoked potentials. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):6861. PMC: 7994633. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85819-w. View

17.

Jutzeler C, Rosner J, Rinert J, Kramer J, Curt A . Normative data for the segmental acquisition of contact heat evoked potentials in cervical dermatomes. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34660. PMC: 5052572. DOI: 10.1038/srep34660. View

18.

Ginzburg K, Tsur N, Karmin C, Speizman T, Tourgeman R, Defrin R . Body awareness and pain habituation: the role of orientation towards somatic signals. J Behav Med. 2015; 38(6):876-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9676-8. View

19.

Baumgartner U, Greffrath W, Treede R . Contact heat and cold, mechanical, electrical and chemical stimuli to elicit small fiber-evoked potentials: merits and limitations for basic science and clinical use. Neurophysiol Clin. 2012; 42(5):267-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2012.06.002. View

20.

Deltombe T, Hanson P, Jamart J, Clerin M . The influence of skin temperature on latency and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve. 1998; 21(1):34-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199801)21:1<34::aid-mus5>3.0.co;2-h. View