An Intensity Matched Comparison of Laser- and Contact Heat Evoked Potentials

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2021 Mar 26

PMID 33767259

Citations 12

Authors

Iara De Schoenmacker

Carson Berry

Jean-Sebastien Blouin

Jan Rosner

Michele Hubli

Catherine R Jutzeler

John L K Kramer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in amplitude is due to biophysical differences between the two methods or a mismatch in stimulation intensity. The aims of the current study were twofold: (1) to directly compare the brain potentials induced by intensity matched laser and contact heat stimulation and (2) investigate how capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia modulates LEPs and CHEPs. Twenty-one healthy subjects were recruited and measured at four experimental sessions: (1) CHEPs + sham, (2) LEPs + sham, (3) CHEPs + capsaicin, and (4) LEPs + capsaicin. Baseline (sham) LEPs latency was significantly shorter and amplitude significantly larger compared to CHEPs, even when matched for perceived pain. Neither CHEPs nor LEPs was sensitive enough to detect secondary hyperalgesia. These differences provide evidence that a faster heating rate results in an earlier and more synchronized LEPs than CHEPs. To our knowledge, this was the first study to match perceived intensity of contact heat and laser stimulations, revealing distinct advantages associated with the acquisition of LEPs.

Citing Articles

Understanding inter-individual variability of experimental pain habituation and conditioned pain modulation in healthy individuals.

De Schoenmacker I, Scheuren P, Sirucek L, Lutolf R, Gorrell L, Rosner J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22070.

PMID: 39333624 PMC: 11436718. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73158-5.

Assessing signs of central sensitization: A critical review of physiological measures in experimentally induced secondary hyperalgesia.

Leone C, Lenoir C, van den Broeke E Eur J Pain. 2024; 29(3):e4733.

PMID: 39315535 PMC: 11754940. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4733.

Low-intensity focused ultrasound to the posterior insula reduces temporal summation of pain.

In A, Strohman A, Payne B, Legon W Brain Stimul. 2024; 17(4):911-924.

PMID: 39089647 PMC: 11452899. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.07.020.

NeuroSense: A non-invasive and configurable somatosensory stimulator with OPENVIBE communication.

Gonzalez-Rodriguez E, Cepeda-Zapata L, Rivas-Silva A, Martinez-Gonzalez V, Alonso-Valerdi L, Ibarra-Zarate D HardwareX. 2024; 18:e00529.

PMID: 38690151 PMC: 11059327. DOI: 10.1016/j.ohx.2024.e00529.

Noninvasive neuromodulation of subregions of the human insula differentially affect pain processing and heart-rate variability: a within-subjects pseudo-randomized trial.

Legon W, Strohman A, In A, Payne B Pain. 2024; 165(7):1625-1641.

PMID: 38314779 PMC: 11189760. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003171.

References

De Keyser R, van den Broeke E, Courtin A, Dufour A, Mouraux A . Event-related brain potentials elicited by high-speed cooling of the skin: A robust and non-painful method to assess the spinothalamic system in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018; 129(5):1011-1019. PMC: 6398569. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.123. View

Granovsky Y, Anand P, Nakae A, Nascimento O, Smith B, Sprecher E . Normative data for Aδ contact heat evoked potentials in adult population: a multicenter study. Pain. 2016; 157(5):1156-1163. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000495. View

Gracely R, Lota L, Walter D, Dubner R . A multiple random staircase method of psychophysical pain assessment. Pain. 1988; 32(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90023-1. View

Bromm B, Jahnke M, Treede R . Responses of human cutaneous afferents to CO2 laser stimuli causing pain. Exp Brain Res. 1984; 55(1):158-66. DOI: 10.1007/BF00240510. View

van den Broeke E, Lenoir C, Mouraux A . Secondary hyperalgesia is mediated by heat-insensitive A-fibre nociceptors. J Physiol. 2016; 594(22):6767-6776. PMC: 5108905. DOI: 10.1113/JP272599. View

Chaumon M, Bishop D, Busch N . A practical guide to the selection of independent components of the electroencephalogram for artifact correction. J Neurosci Methods. 2015; 250:47-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.025. View

Itskovich V, Fei D, Harkins S . Psychophysiological and psychophysical responses to experimental pain induced by two types of cutaneous thermal stimuli. Int J Neurosci. 2000; 105(1-4):63-75. DOI: 10.3109/00207450009003266. View

Kramer J, Haefeli J, Curt A, Steeves J . Increased baseline temperature improves the acquisition of contact heat evoked potentials after spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011; 123(3):582-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.013. View

Hullemann P, Watfeh R, Shao Y, Nerdal A, Binder A, Baron R . Peripheral sensitization reduces laser-evoked potential habituation. Neurophysiol Clin. 2015; 45(6):457-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.10.088. View

10.

Haefeli J, Blum J, Steeves J, Kramer J, Curt A . Differences in spinothalamic function of cervical and thoracic dermatomes: insights using contact heat evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013; 30(3):291-8. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31827ed9ee. View

11.

Haefeli J, Kramer J, Blum J, Curt A . Heterotopic and homotopic nociceptive conditioning stimulation: distinct effects of pain modulation. Eur J Pain. 2014; 18(8):1112-9. DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.00454.x. View

12.

Ronga I, Valentini E, Mouraux A, Iannetti G . Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 109(3):692-701. PMC: 3567386. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00464.2012. View

13.

Jutzeler C, Linde L, Rosner J, Hubli M, Curt A, Kramer J . Single-trial averaging improves the physiological interpretation of contact heat evoked potentials. Neuroimage. 2020; 225:117473. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117473. View

14.

Valeriani M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Le Pera D, Restuccia D, Rosso T, De Armas L . Short-term plastic changes of the human nociceptive system following acute pain induced by capsaicin. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114(10):1879-90. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00180-9. View

15.

Kramer J, Taylor P, Haefeli J, Blum J, Zariffa J, Curt A . Test-retest reliability of contact heat-evoked potentials from cervical dermatomes. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 29(1):70-5. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318246ada2. View

16.

Valeriani M, Tinazzi M, Le Pera D, Restuccia D, De Armas L, Maiese T . Inhibitory effect of capsaicin evoked trigeminal pain on warmth sensation and warmth evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 160(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1983-1. View

17.

Jutzeler C, Rosner J, Rinert J, Kramer J, Curt A . Normative data for the segmental acquisition of contact heat evoked potentials in cervical dermatomes. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34660. PMC: 5052572. DOI: 10.1038/srep34660. View

18.

Springer J, Karlsson P, Madsen C, Johnsen B, Finnerup N, Jensen T . Functional and structural assessment of patients with and without persistent pain after thoracotomy. Eur J Pain. 2016; 21(2):238-249. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.919. View

19.

Kramer J, Jutzeler C, Haefeli J, Curt A, Freund P . Discrepancy between perceived pain and cortical processing: A voxel-based morphometry and contact heat evoked potential study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 127(1):762-768. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.054. View

20.

de Tommaso M, Losito L, Difruscolo O, Sardaro M, Libro G, Guido M . Capsaicin failed in suppressing cortical processing of CO2 laser pain in migraine patients. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 384(1-2):150-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.086. View