» Articles » PMID: 39272308

Effect of Dietary Sugarcane Bagasse on Reproductive Performance, Constipation, and Gut Microbiota of Gestational Sows

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2024 Sep 14
PMID 39272308
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of using sugarcane bagasse (SB) as a substitute for soybean hulls and wheat bran in the diet of pregnant sows on their reproductive performance and gut microbiota. A total of seventy-two primiparous sows were randomly divided into four treatment groups, with eighteen replicates of one sow each. The sows were fed a basal diet supplemented with 0% (CON), 5%, 10%, and 15% SB to replace soybean hulls from day 57 of gestation until the day of the end of the gestation period. The results showed that SB contains higher levels of crude fiber (42.1%) and neutral detergent fiber (81.3%) than soybean hulls, and it also exhibited the highest volumetric expansion when soaked in water (50 g expanding to 389.8 mL) compared to the other six materials we tested (vegetable scraps, soybean hulls, wheat bran, rice bran meal, rice bran, and corn DDGS). Compared with the CON, 5% SB significantly increased the litter birth weight of piglets. Meanwhile, 10% and 15% SB significantly increased the rates of constipation and reduced the contents of isobutyric acid and isovaleric acid in feces. Furthermore, 10% and 15% SB significantly disturbed gut microbial diversity with increasing and decreasing and genera in feces. Interestingly, had a significant negative correlation with isobutyric acid, isovaleric acid, and fecal score, while and had a positive correlation with them. In conclusion, our study indicates that 5% SB can be used as an equivalent substitute for soybean hulls to improve the reproductive performance of sows without affecting their gut microbiota.

References
1.
Fan L, Xia Y, Wang Y, Han D, Liu Y, Li J . Gut microbiota bridges dietary nutrients and host immunity. Sci China Life Sci. 2023; 66(11):2466-2514. PMC: 10247344. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2346-1. View

2.
Renteria-Flores J, Johnston L, Shurson G, Moser R, Webel S . Effect of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber on embryo survival and sow performance. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86(10):2576-84. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0376. View

3.
Dong Z, Liu S, Deng Q, Li G, Tang Y, Wu X . Role of iron in host-microbiota interaction and its effects on intestinal mucosal growth and immune plasticity in a piglet model. Sci China Life Sci. 2023; 66(9):2086-2098. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-022-2409-0. View

4.
Ha S, Choi Y, Mun J, Park S, Kinara E, Park H . Correlation between reproductive performance and sow body weight change during gestation. J Anim Sci Technol. 2024; 66(3):543-554. PMC: 11222117. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2023.e63. View

5.
Zou S, Sun C, Li F, Xie Y, Liang T, Yang Y . Effect of Gardenia Pomace Supplementation on Growth Performance, Blood Metabolites, Immune and Antioxidant Indices, and Meat Quality in Xiangcun Pigs. Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(17). PMC: 9454504. DOI: 10.3390/ani12172280. View