» Articles » PMID: 39255592

Effect of Sonoprocessing on the Quality of Plant-based Analog Foods: Compatibility to Sustainable Development Goals, Drawbacks and Limitations

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Sep 10
PMID 39255592
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sonoprocessing (US), as one of the most well-known and widely used green processing techniques, has tremendous benefits to be used in the food industry. The urgent call for global sustainable food production encourages the usage of such techniques more often and effectively. Using ultrasound as a hurdle technology synergistically with other green methods is crucial to improving the efficiency of the protein shift as well as the number of plant-based analog foods (PBAFs) against conventional products. It was revealed that the US has a significant impact when used as an assistant tool with other green technologies rather than being used alone. It increases the protein extraction efficiencies from plant biomasses, improves the techno-functional properties of food compounds, and makes them more applicable for industrial-scale alternative food production in the circular economy. The US aligns well with the objectives outlined in the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Planetary Boundaries (PBs) framework, demonstrating promising outcomes in life cycle assessment. However, several challenges such as uncontrolled complex matrix effect, free radical formation, uncontrolled microbial growth/germination or off-flavor formation, removal of aromatic compounds, and Maillard reaction, are revealed in an increased number of studies, all of which need to be considered. In addition to a variety of advantages, this review also discusses the drawbacks and limitations of US focusing on PBAF production.

References
1.
Byanju B, Rahman M, Hojilla-Evangelista M, Lamsal B . Effect of high-power sonication pretreatment on extraction and some physicochemical properties of proteins from chickpea, kidney bean, and soybean. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 145:712-721. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.118. View

2.
Jin J, Okagu O, Yagoub A, Udenigwe C . Effects of sonication on the in vitro digestibility and structural properties of buckwheat protein isolates. Ultrason Sonochem. 2020; 70:105348. PMC: 7495248. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105348. View

3.
Xiong T, Xiong W, Ge M, Xia J, Li B, Chen Y . Effect of high intensity ultrasound on structure and foaming properties of pea protein isolate. Food Res Int. 2018; 109:260-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.044. View

4.
Ojha K, Mason T, ODonnell C, Kerry J, Tiwari B . Ultrasound technology for food fermentation applications. Ultrason Sonochem. 2016; 34:410-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.001. View

5.
Wang J, Zhu H, Jiang Y, Xiao J, Yang B, Wen L . Fabrication of icariin-soymilk nanoparticles with ultrasound-assisted treatment. Ultrason Sonochem. 2022; 91:106230. PMC: 9703041. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106230. View