» Articles » PMID: 39246586

Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Information and Choices in Secondary Schools: Human-centred Design of Digital Resources

Abstract

Background: Learning to thinking critically about health information and choices can protect people from unnecessary suffering, harm, and resource waste. Earlier work revealed that children can learn these skills, but printing costs and curricula compatibility remain important barriers to school implementation. We aimed to develop a set of digital learning resources for students to think critically about health that were suitable for use in Kenyan, Rwandan, and Ugandan secondary schools.

Methods: We conducted work in two phases collaborating with teachers, students, schools, and national curriculum development offices using a human-centred design approach. First, we conducted context analyses and an overview of teaching strategies, prioritised content and collected examples. Next, we developed lessons and guidance iteratively, informed by data from user-testing, individual and group interviews, and school pilots.

Results: Final resources include online lesson plans, teachers' guide, and extra resources, with lesson plans in two modes, for use in a classroom equipped with a blackboard/flip-chart and a projector. The resources are accessible offline for use when electricity or Internet is lacking. Teachers preferred the projector mode, as it provided structure and a focal point for class attention. Feedback was largely positive, with teachers and students appreciating the learning and experiencing it as relevant. Four main challenges included time to teach lessons; incorrect comprehension; identifying suitable examples; and technical, logistical, and behavioural challenges with a student-computer mode that we piloted. We resolved challenges by simplifying and combining lessons; increasing opportunities for review and assessment; developing teacher training materials, creating a searchable set of examples; and deactivating the student-computer mode.

Conclusion: Using a human-centred design approach, we created digital resources for teaching secondary school students to think critically about health actions and for training teachers. Be smart about your health resources are open access and can be translated or adapted to other settings.

Citing Articles

One-year follow-up effects of the informed health choices secondary school intervention on students' ability to think critically about health in Uganda: a cluster randomized trial.

Ssenyonga R, Oxman A, Nakyejwe E, Chesire F, Mugisha M, Nsangi A Trials. 2025; 26(1):71.

PMID: 40011888 PMC: 11863962. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08607-7.


Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study.

Ssenyonga R, Lewin S, Nakyejwe E, Chelagat F, Mugisha M, Oxman M Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 39706681 PMC: 11666090. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00484.


Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.

Chesire F, Oxman A, Kaseje M, Gisore V, Mugisha M, Ssenyonga R Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 39706679 PMC: 11666096. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00485.


Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Rwanda: A Mixed Methods Study.

Mugisha M, Oxman A, Nyirazinyoye L, Uwitonze A, Simbi C, Chesire F Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 39706678 PMC: 11666086. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00483.


Effects of the informed health choices secondary school intervention after 1 year: a prospective meta-analysis using individual participant data.

Chesire F, Mugisha M, Ssenyonga R, Rose C, Nsangi A, Kaseje M Trials. 2024; 25(1):733.

PMID: 39478569 PMC: 11523815. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08577-w.


References
1.
Cusack L, Del Mar C, Chalmers I, Gibson E, Hoffmann T . Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018; 7(1):68. PMC: 5930693. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0719-4. View

2.
Janiaud P, Axfors C, Vant Hooft J, Saccilotto R, Agarwal A, Appenzeller-Herzog C . The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days. F1000Res. 2020; 9:1193. PMC: 7539080. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.26707.2. View

3.
Boutron I, Haneef R, Yavchitz A, Baron G, Novack J, Oransky I . Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of "spin" in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients'/caregivers' interpretation of treatment benefit. BMC Med. 2019; 17(1):105. PMC: 6547451. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1330-9. View

4.
Chesire F, Ochieng M, Mugisha M, Ssenyonga R, Oxman M, Nsangi A . Contextualizing critical thinking about health using digital technology in secondary schools in Kenya: a qualitative analysis. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022; 8(1):227. PMC: 9535840. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01183-0. View

5.
Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S, Goldberg B, Rathje S, Lewandowsky S . Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(34):eabo6254. PMC: 9401631. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo6254. View