» Articles » PMID: 36001675

Psychological Inoculation Improves Resilience Against Misinformation on Social Media

Overview
Journal Sci Adv
Specialties Biology
Science
Date 2022 Aug 24
PMID 36001675
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Online misinformation continues to have adverse consequences for society. Inoculation theory has been put forward as a way to reduce susceptibility to misinformation by informing people about how they might be misinformed, but its scalability has been elusive both at a theoretical level and a practical level. We developed five short videos that inoculate people against manipulation techniques commonly used in misinformation: emotionally manipulative language, incoherence, false dichotomies, scapegoating, and ad hominem attacks. In seven preregistered studies, i.e., six randomized controlled studies ( = 6464) and an ecologically valid field study on YouTube ( = 22,632), we find that these videos improve manipulation technique recognition, boost confidence in spotting these techniques, increase people's ability to discern trustworthy from untrustworthy content, and improve the quality of their sharing decisions. These effects are robust across the political spectrum and a wide variety of covariates. We show that psychological inoculation campaigns on social media are effective at improving misinformation resilience at scale.

Citing Articles

Psychological booster shots targeting memory increase long-term resistance against misinformation.

Maertens R, Roozenbeek J, Simons J, Lewandowsky S, Maturo V, Goldberg B Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2062.

PMID: 40069544 PMC: 11897321. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57205-x.


Large-scale analysis of fact-checked stories on Twitter reveals graded effects of ambiguity and falsehood on information reappearance.

Kauk J, Kreysa H, Schweinberger S PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(2):pgaf028.

PMID: 39974768 PMC: 11837328. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf028.


Analysis of the quality of vulvar cancer-related videos on YouTube.

Xu T, Zhao H Transl Cancer Res. 2025; 14(1):102-111.

PMID: 39974393 PMC: 11833394. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-1411.


Perceived self and social relevance of content motivates news sharing across cultures and topics.

Cosme D, Chan H, Sinclair A, Benitez C, Lydic K, Martin R PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(2):pgaf019.

PMID: 39925857 PMC: 11803421. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf019.


Inoculation reduces social media engagement with affectively polarized content in the UK and US.

Smith F, Simchon A, Holford D, Lewandowsky S Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):11.

PMID: 39865178 PMC: 11769841. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00189-7.


References
1.
Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio P, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(5):460-471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. View

2.
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek S, de Graaf K, Larson H . Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(3):337-348. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. View

3.
Toplak M, West R, Stanovich K . The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Mem Cognit. 2011; 39(7):1275-89. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1. View

4.
Pennycook G, Rand D . Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2018; 188:39-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. View

5.
Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S . How to Combat Health Misinformation: A Psychological Approach. Am J Health Promot. 2022; 36(3):569-575. DOI: 10.1177/08901171211070958. View