Bacterial Adhesion and Microleakage of Restorative Materials for Sealing Accessory Canals in Implant Prosthesis

Overview

Journal Bioinformation

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Aug 12

PMID 39131535

Authors

Vishal Rathod

Satish Gujjarlapudi

Sridevi Kaul

Sneha Saraf

Deepak Sharma

Neetu Kharat

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The level of bacterial adhesion and bacterial microleakage in four different materials utilised to seal the access passage of screw retained implant supported prosthesis (SRIP) is of interest to dentists. Four distinct categories were created from the samples on the basis of restorative materials used for sealing access passage in SRIP. Guttapercha and light cured acrylic resin were found to have comparatively low bacterial adhesion and bacterial microleakage in sealing accessory canals in screw retained implant supported prosthesis.

References

Bilgrami A, Alam M, Qazi F, Maqsood A, Basha S, Ahmed N . An In-Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage in Resin-Based Restorative Materials at Different Time Intervals. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(3). PMC: 8838729. DOI: 10.3390/polym14030466. View

Guindy J, Besimo C, Besimo R, Schiel H, Meyer J . Bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained implant-borne crowns in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25(6):403-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00261.x. View

Park S, Lee Y, Kim Y, Yu S, Bae J, Cho H . Microleakage of different sealing materials in access holes of internal connection implant systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 108(3):173-80. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60143-7. View

Jervoe-Storm P, Jepsen S, Johren P, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N . Internal bacterial colonization of implants: association with peri-implant bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 26(8):957-963. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12421. View

Shimazu K, Karibe H, Ogata K . Effect of artificial saliva contamination on adhesion of dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33(4):545-50. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-007. View

Kronman J, Goldman M, GOLDMAN L, Coleman E, Kliment C . Microbiologic evaluation of poly-HEMA root canal filling material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979; 48(2):175-7. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(79)90057-4. View

Mishra S, Chowdhary R, Kumari S . Microleakage at the Different Implant Abutment Interface: A Systematic Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11(6):ZE10-ZE15. PMC: 5535497. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28951.10054. View

Schoenbaum T, Wadhwani C, Stevenson R . Covering the Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole: A Biological Approach to Material Selection and Technique. J Oral Implantol. 2016; 43(1):39-44. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00119. View

Vaidyanathan T, Vaidyanathan J . Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 88(2):558-78. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31253. View

10.

Moraguez O, Belser U . The use of polytetrafluoroethylene tape for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103(3):189-91. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60029-7. View

11.

Erdilek D, Dorter C, Koray F, Kunzelmann K, Guray Efes B, Gomec Y . Effect of Thermo-mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage in Class II Ormocer Restorations. Eur J Dent. 2009; 3(3):200-5. PMC: 2741191. View

12.

Mihali S, Canjau S, Bratu E, Wang H . Utilization of Ceramic Inlays for Sealing Implant Prostheses Screw Access Holes: A Case-Control Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31(5):1142-9. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4733. View

13.

do Nascimento C, Pita M, Calefi P, de Oliveira Silva T, Sa Dos Santos J, Pedrazzi V . Different sealing materials preventing the microbial leakage into the screw-retained implant restorations: an in vitro analysis by DNA checkerboard hybridization. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 28(2):242-250. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12790. View

14.

Soares G, Ambrosano G, Lima D, Marchi G, Correr-Sobrinho L, Lovadino J . Effect of light polymerization time, mode, and thermal and mechanical load cycling on microleakage in resin composite restorations. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 29(2):545-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1244-7. View

15.

Arora S, Arora A, Upadhyaya V, Jain S . Comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with different temporary luting cements: In vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016; 16(1):42-8. PMC: 4832796. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.164911. View

16.

Singh A, Garg S . Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Bridge Materials-An Invitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(8):ZC72-7. PMC: 5028505. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19582.8291. View

17.

Raab P, Alamanos C, Hahnel S, Papavasileiou D, Behr M, Rosentritt M . Dental materials and their performance for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported restorations. Dent Mater J. 2017; 36(2):123-128. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2016-049. View

18.

Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H . The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2005; 29(6):713-9. View

19.

do Nascimento C, Ikeda L, Pita M, Pedroso e Silva R, Pedrazzi V, Albuquerque R . Marginal fit and microbial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of fixed partial prostheses: An in vitro analysis using Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114(6):831-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.009. View

20.

Wittneben J, Joda T, Weber H, Bragger U . Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis. Periodontol 2000. 2016; 73(1):141-151. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12168. View