» Articles » PMID: 28000276

Screw Retained Vs. Cement Retained Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 22
PMID 28000276
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A fixed dental prosthesis can be secured to an endosseous implant via cementation (using a provisional or definitive cement) on an implant abutment that is screw retained to the implant or directly in the implant via screw retention. The clinical decision as to which retention system best suits the individual patient depends on several factors. The aim of this review is to present a detailed overview of the factors potentially influencing whether to choose screw retention or cement retention. These factors include the individual indication, advantages and disadvantages of the different retention mechanisms, the retention provided, retrievability, provisionalization, esthetics and clinical performance, including failures and complications. The results of recently published systematic reviews on this topic are discussed and an overview is provided. A decision tree is presented to facilitate the clinical selection of the retention type. This overview concludes that the choice of retention type (screw retained or cement retained) might not influence the overall survival of the implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis, but may be responsible for the development of certain complications. The decision may depend on technical feasibility and on weighing the pros and cons.

Citing Articles

Novel Esthetic Technique for Restoring Dental Implant Access Holes: A Case Report.

Seki K, Shiratsuchi K, Toki A, Kamimoto A, Hagiwara Y Dent J (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39996927 PMC: 11853855. DOI: 10.3390/dj13020053.


CAD/CAM single prosthesis: A 25 years bibliometric assessment of prosthetic outcomes.

Del Rio Silva L, Veloso D, Barao V, Mesquita M, Borges G Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e42166.

PMID: 39968144 PMC: 11834022. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42166.


Dental Practitioners' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward the Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.

Zakaria O, Tabassum A, Attia D, Alshehri T, Alanazi D, Alshehri J Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727444 PMC: 11674885. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120387.


Impact of type and position of abutment connection on microstrain distribution: an study.

Siripru J, Puengpaiboon U, Sukjamsri C, Mahardawi B, Aimjirakul N J Adv Prosthodont. 2024; 16(5):290-301.

PMID: 39512874 PMC: 11538894. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.290.


Effect of crown seating methods on the remnant cement in the subgingival region of a cement-retained implant crown.

Ji F, Shim J, Lee J, Oh H, Ryu J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24249.

PMID: 39414886 PMC: 11484903. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73806-w.