Different Sealing Materials Preventing the Microbial Leakage into the Screw-retained Implant Restorations: an In vitro Analysis by DNA Checkerboard Hybridization
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: The aim of this controlled in vitro study was to identify and quantify up to 38 microbial species penetrating through the screw-retained implant prostheses with different sealing materials.
Material And Methods: Sixty morse cone implants were restored with single-unit screw-retained prostheses. All the components were randomly divided into five groups (n = 12) according to the proposed materials: (1) polytetrafluoroethylene tape+composite resin; (2) polytetrafluoroethylene tape+gutta-percha; (3) polytetrafluoroethylene tape+light-polymerized provisional composite; (4) cotton pellet+gutta-percha; and (5) cotton pellet+light-polymerized provisional composite. Human saliva was used as contaminant media, and DNA checkerboard hybridization was used to identify and quantify microbial species.
Results: Microbial leakage was observed in all groups: M. salivarium, S. pasteuri, P. nigrescens, and P. melaninogenica were the species presenting the highest values of genome count, prevalence, and proportion within the groups. The total microbial mean counts (×10 , ±SD) were as follows: Group 1 (2.81 ± 0.38), Group 2 (3.41 ± 0.38), Group 3 (6.02 ± 1.48), Group 4 (6.40 ± 1.42), and Group 5 (17.45 ± 1.67). Group 5 showed the higher microbial counts (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Moderate to high counts of pathogenic/nonpathogenic species were detected in the inner parts of implants from all groups. The lowest values of microbial counts were recorded for polytetrafluoroethylene tape associated with composite resin or gutta-percha; cotton pellet associated with light-polymerized provisional composite presented the highest microbial counts.
Implant Mechanics, Biological Milieu, and Peri-Implantitis: A Narrative Review.
Mariam S, Kshirsagar R, Hasan S, Khadtare Y, Rajpurohit K, Rai H Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67173.
PMID: 39295709 PMC: 11409158. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67173.
Rathod V, Gujjarlapudi S, Kaul S, Saraf S, Sharma D, Kharat N Bioinformation. 2024; 20(6):678-682.
PMID: 39131535 PMC: 11312330. DOI: 10.6026/973206300200678.
Yamaguchi K, Munakata M, Ishii K, Uesugi T Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).
PMID: 38391681 PMC: 10886632. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020195.
Zhou H, Ye S, Lyu X, Feng H, Liu M, Wen C BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):362.
PMID: 36008833 PMC: 9404578. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02403-y.
Wawrzyk A, Rahnama M, Sofinska-Chmiel W, Wilczynski S, Lobacz M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(12).
PMID: 35742743 PMC: 9224170. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127494.