» Articles » PMID: 39124734

Comparison of Five-Day Vs. Fourteen-Day Incubation of Cultures for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39124734
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are among the most morbid complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The ideal incubation time, however, for intraoperative cultures for PJI diagnosis remains unclear. As such, the aim of this study was to determine if any differences existed in culture-positive rates and organism detection between five-day and fourteen-day cultures. This retrospective cohort study consisted of THA cases diagnosed with PJI performed between May 2014 and May 2020 at a single tertiary-care institution. Analyses compared five-day and fourteen-day cultures and carried out a pre-specified subgroup analysis by organism and PJI type. A total of 147 surgeries were performed in 101 patients (57.1% females), of which 65% (n = 98) obtained five-day cultures and 34% (n = 49) obtained fourteen-day cultures. The positive culture rate was 67.3% (n = 99) with being the most common pathogen identified (n = 41 specimens, 41.4%). The positive culture rate was not significantly different between groups (66.3% five-day, 69.4% fourteen-day, = 0.852). Fourteen-day cultures had a significantly longer time-to-positive culture (5.0 days) than five-day cultures (3.0 days, < 0.001), a higher rate of fungi (5.6% vs. 0%), and a lower rate of Gram-negatives (4.5% vs. 18.7%, = 0.016). Fourteen-day cultures did not increase the positivity rate, had higher rates of slow-growth pathogens, and had a longer time-to-positivization than five-day cultures. Prolonged culture holds may provide more thorough organism detection for PJI without increasing the diagnostic culture yield.

References
1.
Zmistowski B, Karam J, Durinka J, Casper D, Parvizi J . Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(24):2177-84. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00789. View

2.
Schafer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L . Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(11):1403-9. DOI: 10.1086/592973. View

3.
Esteban J, Alvarez-Alvarez B, Blanco A, Fernandez-Roblas R, Gadea I, Garcia-Canete J . Prolonged incubation time does not increase sensitivity for the diagnosis of implant-related infection using samples prepared by sonication of the implants. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(7):1001-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31174. View

4.
Parvizi J, Tan T, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen A . The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(5):1309-1314.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. View

5.
Springer B, Cahue S, Etkin C, Lewallen D, McGrory B . Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective. Arthroplast Today. 2017; 3(2):137-140. PMC: 5485227. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.05.003. View