» Articles » PMID: 18937579

Prolonged Bacterial Culture to Identify Late Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a Promising Strategy

Overview
Journal Clin Infect Dis
Date 2008 Oct 22
PMID 18937579
Citations 195
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The value of microbiological culture to diagnose late periprosthetic infection is limited, especially because standard methods may fail to detect biofilm-forming sessile or other fastidious bacteria. There is no agreement on the appropriate cultivation period, although this period is a crucial factor. This study was designed to assess the duration of culture that is necessary for reliable detection.

Patients And Methods: Ten periprosthetic tissue specimens each were obtained during revision from 284 patients with suspected late hip or knee arthroplasty infection. Five samples were examined by microbiological culture over a 14-day period, and 5 were subjected to histologic analysis. To define infection, a pre-established algorithm was used; this included detection of indistinguishable organisms in >/=2 tissue samples or growth in 1 tissue sample and a positive result of histologic analysis (>5 neutrophils in at least 10 high-power fields). The time to detection of organisms was monitored.

Results: Infection was diagnosed in 110 patients. After 7 days (the longest incubation period most frequently reported), the detection rate via culture was merely 73.6%. Organisms indicating infection were found for up to 13 days. "Early"-detected species (mostly staphylococci) emerged predominantly during the first week, whereas "late"-detected agents (mostly Propionibacterium species) were detected mainly during the second week. In both populations, an unequivocal correlation between the number of culture-positive tissue samples and positive results of histologic analysis was noted, which corroborated the evidence that true infections were detected over the entire cultivation period.

Conclusions: Prolonged microbiological culture for 2 weeks is promising because it yields signs of periprosthetic infection in a significant proportion of patients that would otherwise remain unidentified.

Citing Articles

Predictive Factors for Risk of Reinfection in Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

Blersch B, Sax F, Schuster P, Fink B Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001411 PMC: 11851527. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14020167.


Advantages in orthopaedic implant infection diagnostics by additional analysis of explants.

Suda A, Miethke T, Landua N, Obertacke U Int Orthop. 2025; .

PMID: 39969590 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-025-06424-4.


Prolonged incubation time unwarranted for acute periprosthetic joint infections.

Morreel E, van Dessel H, Geurts J, Savelkoul P, van Loo I J Clin Microbiol. 2025; 63(2):e0114324.

PMID: 39817758 PMC: 11837491. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01143-24.


The identification of low-pathogenic bacteria on removed spinal implants and implications for antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Joerger A, Butenschoen V, Feihl S, Ruhling S, Kirschke J, Meyer B Brain Spine. 2025; 5:104152.

PMID: 39741787 PMC: 11683221. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104152.


Is the Presence of Sinus Tract in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Still One of the Main Deciding Factors for Septic Revision?.

Sandu E, Cursaru A, Serban B, Iordache S, Costache M, Cirstoiu C Cureus. 2024; 16(12):e75379.

PMID: 39654596 PMC: 11627193. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75379.