» Articles » PMID: 39072909

Common Practices of Dental Implant Maintenance Among Dental Hygienists Working in the Netherlands - A Survey

Overview
Journal Int J Dent Hyg
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Jul 29
PMID 39072909
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dental implant maintenance is crucial to obtain and maintain a healthy peri-implant situation. Although it is part of a dental hygienists (DH) scope of practice, the knowledge and common practices among DHs in the Netherlands are unclear.

Materials And Methods: A web-based survey was distributed by the Dutch Association of DHs, by spreading survey QR codes and snowballing. The role of the different DH curricula 2- or 3-year diploma and a 4-year bachelor's degree is evaluated.

Results: In total, 165 (diploma: 73, bachelor: 92) DHs responded. Peri-implant diseases were well known (98%), indices and clinical symptoms were used to assess peri-implant tissues. A periodontal probe (97%) was used and bone loss was evaluated on radiographs (89%). Treatment was performed supra- and subgingivally (69%), mostly by titanium (45%) or plastic hand instruments (42%). Ultrasonic (52%) and air-abrasive (52%) devices were often used. The recall interval for maintenance was based on a risk-adjusted protocol (70%). DHs with a bachelor's received significantly more training compared to DHs with a diploma during primary education (p < 0.001). Diploma DHs mainly obtained their knowledge from continuing education (p = 0.04). In general, there was no significant difference in knowledge or common practices.

Conclusions: The primary education of DHs with a 2- or 3-year diploma and a 4-year bachelor's varies. Due to the continuing education of diploma DHs, knowledge and common practices generally do not differ. Most DHs in the Netherlands perform implant maintenance. A periodontal probe and radiographs are used for examination. Instrumentation is performed supra- and subgingivally, usually with titanium or plastic hand instruments. The recall interval is based on a patient's risk assessment.

Citing Articles

Common practices of dental implant maintenance among dental hygienists working in the Netherlands - A survey.

Loeffen A, Van Swaaij B, Saminsky M, Slot D Int J Dent Hyg. 2024; 23(1):14-25.

PMID: 39072909 PMC: 11717961. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12841.

References
1.
Ward S, Czuszak C, Thompson A, Downey M, Collins M . Assessment and maintenance of dental implants: clinical and knowledge-seeking practices of dental hygienists. J Dent Hyg. 2012; 86(2):104-10. View

2.
Derks J, Tomasi C . Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 42 Suppl 16:S158-71. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12334. View

3.
Sharma A, Duc N, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam N, Ng S, Abbas K . A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36(10):3179-3187. PMC: 8481359. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. View

4.
Mann M, Parmar D, Walmsley A, Lea S . Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 23(1):76-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02186.x. View

5.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A . The impact of oral implants - past and future, 1966-2042. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005; 71(5):327. View