» Articles » PMID: 21488970

Effect of Plastic-covered Ultrasonic Scalers on Titanium Implant Surfaces

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Apr 15
PMID 21488970
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Maintaining oral health around titanium implants is essential. The formation of a biofilm on the titanium surface will influence the continuing success of the implant. These concerns have led to modified ultrasonic scaler instruments that look to reduce implant damage while maximising the cleaning effect. This study aimed to assess the effect of instrumentation, with traditional and modified ultrasonic scalers, on titanium implant surfaces and to correlate this with the oscillations of the instruments.

Materials And Methods: Two ultrasonic insert designs (metallic TFI-10 and a plastic-tipped implant insert) were selected. Each scaler probe was scanned using a scanning laser vibrometer, under loaded and unloaded conditions, to determine their oscillation characteristics. Loads were applied against a titanium implant (100g and 200 g) for 10 s. The resulting implant surfaces were then scanned using laser profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results: Insert probes oscillated with an elliptical motion with the maximum amplitude at the probe tip. Laser profilometry detected defects in the titanium surface only for the metallic scaler insert. Defect widths at 200 g high power were significantly larger than all other load/power conditions (P<0.02). Using SEM, it was observed that modifications to the implant surface had occurred following instrumentation with the plastic-tipped insert. Debris was also visible around the defects.

Conclusions: Metal scalers produce defects in titanium implant surfaces and load and power are important factors in the damage caused. Plastic-coated scaler probes cause minimal damage to implant surfaces and have a polishing action but can leave plastic deposits behind on the implant surface.

Citing Articles

Common practices of dental implant maintenance among dental hygienists working in the Netherlands - A survey.

Loeffen A, Van Swaaij B, Saminsky M, Slot D Int J Dent Hyg. 2024; 23(1):14-25.

PMID: 39072909 PMC: 11717961. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12841.


An In Vivo Investigation of Non-Metallic vs. Metallic Hand Scalers on Zirconia Implant-Supported Crowns: A Year-Long Analysis of Peri-Implant Maintenance.

Roemermann D, Atout R, Pesun I, Kelekis-Cholakis A, Stavropoulou C, Renvert S J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(1).

PMID: 38248676 PMC: 10817302. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15010009.


Evaluating the effect of mechanical debridement with adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in comparison with mechanical debridement alone on the peri-implant parameters in type 2 diabetic mellitus patients with peri-implantitis: a....

Afrasiabi S, Heidari M, Younespour S, Chiniforush N BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):751.

PMID: 37828479 PMC: 10571232. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03337-9.


Sono-processes: Emerging systems and their applicability within the (bio-)medical field.

Siebenmorgen C, Poortinga A, van Rijn P Ultrason Sonochem. 2023; 100:106630.

PMID: 37826890 PMC: 10582584. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106630.


Awareness and management of peri-implantitis and peri-mucositis among private dental Practitioners in Hyderabad - A cross-sectional study.

Tripathi R, Vasudevan S, Palle A, Gedela R, Punj A, Vaishnavi V J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2020; 24(5):461-466.

PMID: 33144775 PMC: 7592623. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_301_19.