» Articles » PMID: 39066052

Physical Functioning, Physical Activity, and Variability in Gait Performance During the Six-Minute Walk Test

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39066052
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Instrumenting the six-minute walk test (6MWT) adds information about gait quality and insight into fall risk. Being physically active and preserving multi-directional stepping abilities are also important for fall risk reduction. This analysis investigated the relationship of gait quality during the 6MWT with physical functioning and physical activity. Twenty-one veterans (62.2 ± 6.4 years) completed the four square step test (FSST) multi-directional stepping assessment, a gait speed assessment, health questionnaires, and the accelerometer-instrumented 6MWT. An activity monitor worn at home captured free-living physical activity. Gait measures were not significantly different between minutes of the 6MWT. However, participants with greater increases in stride time (ρ = -0.594, < 0.01) and stance time (ρ = -0.679, < 0.01) during the 6MWT reported lower physical functioning. Neither physical activity nor sedentary time were related to 6MWT gait quality. Participants exploring a larger range in stride time variability (ρ = 0.614, < 0.01) and stance time variability (ρ = 0.498, < 0.05) during the 6MWT required more time to complete the FSST. Participants needing at least 15 s to complete the FSST meaningfully differed from those completing the FSST more quickly on all gait measures studied. Instrumenting the 6MWT helps detect ranges of gait performance and provides insight into functional limitations missed with uninstrumented administration. Established FSST cut points identify aging adults with poorer gait quality.

References
1.
Ben Mansour K, Rezzoug N, Gorce P . Analysis of several methods and inertial sensors locations to assess gait parameters in able-bodied subjects. Gait Posture. 2015; 42(4):409-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.05.020. View

2.
Cleary K, Skornyakov E . Predicting falls in older adults using the four square step test. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017; 33(10):766-771. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1354951. View

3.
Rispens S, van Schooten K, Pijnappels M, Daffertshofer A, Beek P, van Dieen J . Identification of fall risk predictors in daily life measurements: gait characteristics' reliability and association with self-reported fall history. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 29(1):54-61. DOI: 10.1177/1545968314532031. View

4.
van Schooten K, Pijnappels M, Rispens S, Elders P, Lips P, Daffertshofer A . Daily-Life Gait Quality as Predictor of Falls in Older People: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0158623. PMC: 4936679. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158623. View

5.
Bohannon R, DePasquale L . Physical Functioning Scale of the Short-Form (SF) 36: internal consistency and validity with older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2010; 33(1):16-8. View