Examining the Reliability, Correlation, and Validity of Commonly Used Assessment Tools to Measure Balance
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: The Biodex SD Stability System has been shown to be a reliable assessment tool for postural stability. However, its ability to provide an accurate representation of balance has not been compared with functional performance measures such as the four-square step test (FSST) and timed-up-and-go test (TUG). The purpose of this study was to investigate reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of FSST, TUG, and Biodex SD (limits of stability [LOS] and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance [m-CTSIB]).
Methods: An observational reliability and validity study was conducted. A convenience sample of 105 healthy adults, 77 females and 28 males, mean age 24.5 years old (± 4.66 SD) performed balance assessments including the FSST, TUG, Biodex SD LOS, and m-CTSIB. For LOS, the overall percentage and test duration were recorded. For m-CTSIB, the overall Sway Index was recorded. Condition 1 of the m-CTSIB represented simple postural stability.
Results: The Biodex SD LOS overall percentage, TUG, and FSST showed strong to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .83 [mean 1: 58.14, mean 2: 60.54], .88 [mean 1: 6.98 seconds, mean 2: 6.91 seconds], .92 [mean 1: 6.29 seconds, mean 2: 6.14 seconds], respectively), while the Biodex SD m-CTSIB overall percentage demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .75 [mean 1: 1.18, mean 2: 1.18]). The LOS test duration showed moderate test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .58 [mean 1: 38.55 seconds, mean 2: 37.10 seconds]), while the m-CTSIB condition 1 showed poor test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .24 [mean 1: 0.63, mean 2: 0.66]). Weak construct validity was found between TUG, FSST, and Biodex SD measures of LOS and m-CTSIB ( values = -0.15-0.22).
Conclusion: It is suggested that clinicians use more than one measure to assess different aspects of a patient's balance deficits to better guide treatment and intervention.
Pulmonary function, body posture and balance in young adults with asthma: A cross-sectional study.
Alaparthi G, Moustafa I, Lopes A, Ferreira A PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0316663.
PMID: 40029906 PMC: 11875369. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316663.
Ayas I, Citaker S, Kanatli U BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025; 17(1):1.
PMID: 39748429 PMC: 11697846. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-01022-0.
Emara H, Sobh E, Almohammadi R, Alamri E, Aljohani M, Alhammad A J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:4645-4652.
PMID: 39411201 PMC: 11474542. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S485973.
Young S, Norris E, Shifflett T, Nisbet D, Saunders B, Driver C Int J Exerc Sci. 2024; 17(1):1183-1192.
PMID: 39257646 PMC: 11385286. DOI: 10.70252/AMXQ4966.
The Effect of Cochlear Implant Stimulation on Postural Control.
Ardic F, Tumkaya F, Atigan A, Ardic F Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 62(1):1-6.
PMID: 39257035 PMC: 11587520. DOI: 10.4274/tao.2024.2023-12-9.