» Articles » PMID: 30623052

Examining the Reliability, Correlation, and Validity of Commonly Used Assessment Tools to Measure Balance

Overview
Journal Health Sci Rep
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jan 10
PMID 30623052
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The Biodex SD Stability System has been shown to be a reliable assessment tool for postural stability. However, its ability to provide an accurate representation of balance has not been compared with functional performance measures such as the four-square step test (FSST) and timed-up-and-go test (TUG). The purpose of this study was to investigate reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of FSST, TUG, and Biodex SD (limits of stability [LOS] and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance [m-CTSIB]).

Methods: An observational reliability and validity study was conducted. A convenience sample of 105 healthy adults, 77 females and 28 males, mean age 24.5 years old (± 4.66 SD) performed balance assessments including the FSST, TUG, Biodex SD LOS, and m-CTSIB. For LOS, the overall percentage and test duration were recorded. For m-CTSIB, the overall Sway Index was recorded. Condition 1 of the m-CTSIB represented simple postural stability.

Results: The Biodex SD LOS overall percentage, TUG, and FSST showed strong to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .83 [mean 1: 58.14, mean 2: 60.54], .88 [mean 1: 6.98 seconds, mean 2: 6.91 seconds], .92 [mean 1: 6.29 seconds, mean 2: 6.14 seconds], respectively), while the Biodex SD m-CTSIB overall percentage demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .75 [mean 1: 1.18, mean 2: 1.18]). The LOS test duration showed moderate test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .58 [mean 1: 38.55 seconds, mean 2: 37.10 seconds]), while the m-CTSIB condition 1 showed poor test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .24 [mean 1: 0.63, mean 2: 0.66]). Weak construct validity was found between TUG, FSST, and Biodex SD measures of LOS and m-CTSIB ( values = -0.15-0.22).

Conclusion: It is suggested that clinicians use more than one measure to assess different aspects of a patient's balance deficits to better guide treatment and intervention.

Citing Articles

Pulmonary function, body posture and balance in young adults with asthma: A cross-sectional study.

Alaparthi G, Moustafa I, Lopes A, Ferreira A PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0316663.

PMID: 40029906 PMC: 11875369. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316663.


Postural balance impairment following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the early postoperative period: a prospective cohort study.

Ayas I, Citaker S, Kanatli U BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025; 17(1):1.

PMID: 39748429 PMC: 11697846. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-01022-0.


Quality of Life and Functional Independence of TheraTogs in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Emara H, Sobh E, Almohammadi R, Alamri E, Aljohani M, Alhammad A J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:4645-4652.

PMID: 39411201 PMC: 11474542. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S485973.


Reliability of the Instrumented Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance Using a Virtual Balance Device.

Young S, Norris E, Shifflett T, Nisbet D, Saunders B, Driver C Int J Exerc Sci. 2024; 17(1):1183-1192.

PMID: 39257646 PMC: 11385286. DOI: 10.70252/AMXQ4966.


The Effect of Cochlear Implant Stimulation on Postural Control.

Ardic F, Tumkaya F, Atigan A, Ardic F Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 62(1):1-6.

PMID: 39257035 PMC: 11587520. DOI: 10.4274/tao.2024.2023-12-9.


References
1.
Duncan R, Earhart G . Four square step test performance in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013; 37(1):2-8. DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31827f0d7a. View

2.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S . The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39(2):142-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. View

3.
Sousa A, Silva A, R S Tavares J . Biomechanical and neurophysiological mechanisms related to postural control and efficiency of movement: a review. Somatosens Mot Res. 2012; 29(4):131-43. DOI: 10.3109/08990220.2012.725680. View

4.
Blanca M, Alarcon R, Arnau J, Bono R, Bendayan R . Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?. Psicothema. 2017; 29(4):552-557. DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383. View

5.
Dite W, Connor H, Curtis H . Clinical identification of multiple fall risk early after unilateral transtibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(1):109-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.015. View