» Articles » PMID: 39065285

Transitioning to Microplastic-Free Seed Coatings: Challenges and Solutions

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39065285
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review addresses the issue of replacing manufactured microplastics in seed coatings used in agriculture. Firstly, it focuses on the policy and regulatory actions taken on microplastics at a global level. There is no consensus within the scientific community on the definition of a microplastic and, more generally, on the classification of plastic debris. Nevertheless, several decision schemes have been proposed in an attempt to define the notion of microplastics. The different criteria relevant to this definition, such as the size, physical state, chemical structure, origin, and persistence of microplastics, are discussed, with a comparison being made between the REACH regulation and the scientific literature. Seed production and processing are also discussed, with the functions of seed coatings being explained in order to gain a better understanding of the properties to be considered in a substitution strategy for currently used microplastics. The main challenges are multiple; substitutes must provide the same performance as microplastics: (i) improving the adherence of the treatment to the seed, (ii) distributing the treatment more evenly over the seed, (iii) reducing the amount of dust-off when handling treated seed, and (iv) improving the seed flowability, which is particularly important during the sowing stage, all while preserving the physiological properties of the seed. Substitute polymers are proposed according to the desired performance and functional properties: two main chemical families of biopolymers were identified in the literature: polysaccharides and proteins. Among them, 13 and 6 polymers, respectively, complied with REACH regulation, demonstrating adhesion, dust reduction performances, and preservation of seed physiological quality in particular. This work aims to guide future studies on microplastic substitution in seed coatings, and to highlight research needs in this area. It is based on an analysis and discussion of the literature, identifying and listing potential substitutes.

Citing Articles

Using Static Multiple Light Scattering to Develop Microplastic-Free Seed Film-Coating Formulations.

Langlet R, Valentin R, Morard M, Raynaud C Molecules. 2024; 29(23).

PMID: 39683907 PMC: 11643206. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29235750.

References
1.
Kole P, Lohr A, Van Belleghem F, Ragas A . Wear and Tear of Tyres: A Stealthy Source of Microplastics in the Environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(10). PMC: 5664766. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101265. View

2.
Chen Q, Zhao H, Liu Y, Jin L, Peng R . Factors Affecting the Adsorption of Heavy Metals by Microplastics and Their Toxic Effects on Fish. Toxics. 2023; 11(6). PMC: 10305669. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11060490. View

3.
Li X, Wu J, Cheng X, Cai Z, Wang Z, Zhou J . Biodegradable microplastics reduce the effectiveness of biofertilizers by altering rhizospheric microecological functions. J Environ Manage. 2024; 352:120071. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120071. View

4.
Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson R, Thiel M . Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(6):3060-75. DOI: 10.1021/es2031505. View

5.
Lackner M, Mukherjee A, Koller M . What Are "Bioplastics"? Defining Renewability, Biosynthesis, Biodegradability, and Biocompatibility. Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(24). PMC: 10747977. DOI: 10.3390/polym15244695. View