» Articles » PMID: 38172192

Maternal Exposure to Polyethylene Micro- and Nanoplastics Impairs Umbilical Blood Flow but Not Fetal Growth in Pregnant Mice

Abstract

While microplastics have been recently detected in human blood and the placenta, their impact on human health is not well understood. Using a mouse model of environmental exposure during pregnancy, our group has previously reported that exposure to polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics throughout gestation results in fetal growth restriction. While polystyrene is environmentally relevant, polyethylene is the most widely produced plastic and amongst the most commonly detected microplastic in drinking water and human blood. In this study, we investigated the effect of maternal exposure to polyethylene micro- and nanoplastics on fetal growth and placental function. Healthy, pregnant CD-1 dams were divided into three groups: 10 ng/L of 740-4990 nm polyethylene with surfactant in drinking water (n = 12), surfactant alone in drinking water (n = 12) or regular filtered drinking water (n = 11). At embryonic day 17.5, high-frequency ultrasound was used to investigate the placental and fetal hemodynamic responses following exposure. While maternal exposure to polyethylene did not impact fetal growth, there was a significant effect on placental function with a 43% increase in umbilical artery blood flow in the polyethylene group compared to controls (p < 0.01). These results suggest polyethylene has the potential to cause adverse pregnancy outcomes through abnormal placental function.

Citing Articles

Microplastic Particles Detected in Fetal Cord Blood, Placenta, and Meconium: A Pilot Study of Nine Mother-Infant Pairs in South China.

Zhu M, Li X, Lin W, Zeng D, Yang P, Ni W Toxics. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39771065 PMC: 11679465. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12120850.


Concerning influences of micro/nano plastics on female reproductive health: focusing on cellular and molecular pathways from animal models to human studies.

Balali H, Morabbi A, Karimian M Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):141.

PMID: 39529078 PMC: 11552210. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01314-7.


Micro/Nanoplastic Exposure on Placental Health and Adverse Pregnancy Risks: Novel Assessment System Based upon Targeted Risk Assessment Environmental Chemicals Strategy.

Wan D, Liu Y, Chang Q, Liu Z, Wang Q, Niu R Toxics. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195655 PMC: 11359514. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12080553.


Transitioning to Microplastic-Free Seed Coatings: Challenges and Solutions.

Langlet R, Valentin R, Morard M, Raynaud C Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39065285 PMC: 11280678. DOI: 10.3390/polym16141969.


Single pulmonary nanopolystyrene exposure in late-stage pregnancy dysregulates maternal and fetal cardiovascular function.

Cary C, Fournier S, Adams S, Wang X, Yurkow E, Stapleton P Toxicol Sci. 2024; 199(1):149-159.

PMID: 38366927 PMC: 11057520. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae019.

References
1.
Golub M, Sobin C . Statistical modeling with litter as a random effect in mixed models to manage "intralitter likeness". Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2019; 77:106841. DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2019.106841. View

2.
Cahill L, Zhou Y, Seed M, Macgowan C, Sled J . Brain sparing in fetal mice: BOLD MRI and Doppler ultrasound show blood redistribution during hypoxia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014; 34(6):1082-8. PMC: 4050255. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.62. View

3.
Zaheer J, Kim H, Ko I, Jo E, Choi E, Lee H . Pre/post-natal exposure to microplastic as a potential risk factor for autism spectrum disorder. Environ Int. 2022; 161:107121. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107121. View

4.
Amereh F, Amjadi N, Mohseni-Bandpei A, Isazadeh S, Mehrabi Y, Eslami A . Placental plastics in young women from general population correlate with reduced foetal growth in IUGR pregnancies. Environ Pollut. 2022; 314:120174. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120174. View

5.
Hartmann N, Huffer T, Thompson R, Hassellov M, Verschoor A, Daugaard A . Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris. Environ Sci Technol. 2019; 53(3):1039-1047. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05297. View