» Articles » PMID: 22321064

Microplastics in the Marine Environment: a Review of the Methods Used for Identification and Quantification

Overview
Date 2012 Feb 11
PMID 22321064
Citations 364
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review of 68 studies compares the methodologies used for the identification and quantification of microplastics from the marine environment. Three main sampling strategies were identified: selective, volume-reduced, and bulk sampling. Most sediment samples came from sandy beaches at the high tide line, and most seawater samples were taken at the sea surface using neuston nets. Four steps were distinguished during sample processing: density separation, filtration, sieving, and visual sorting of microplastics. Visual sorting was one of the most commonly used methods for the identification of microplastics (using type, shape, degradation stage, and color as criteria). Chemical and physical characteristics (e.g., specific density) were also used. The most reliable method to identify the chemical composition of microplastics is by infrared spectroscopy. Most studies reported that plastic fragments were polyethylene and polypropylene polymers. Units commonly used for abundance estimates are "items per m(2)" for sediment and sea surface studies and "items per m(3)" for water column studies. Mesh size of sieves and filters used during sampling or sample processing influence abundance estimates. Most studies reported two main size ranges of microplastics: (i) 500 μm-5 mm, which are retained by a 500 μm sieve/net, and (ii) 1-500 μm, or fractions thereof that are retained on filters. We recommend that future programs of monitoring continue to distinguish these size fractions, but we suggest standardized sampling procedures which allow the spatiotemporal comparison of microplastic abundance across marine environments.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive study of the microplastic footprint in the urban pond and river of Eastern India.

Mandal M, Roy A, Sarkar A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8645.

PMID: 40082487 PMC: 11906588. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87452-3.


Comparison of cellulolytic enzyme treatment and Fenton oxidation for analysis of microplastics in tire rubber particles.

Lee S, Yamamoto K, Tobino T, Nakajima F Water Environ Res. 2025; 97(3):e70053.

PMID: 40070321 PMC: 11897782. DOI: 10.1002/wer.70053.


Artificial plasticenta: how polystyrene nanoplastics affect cultured human trophoblast cells.

Ragusa A, Cristiano L, Di Vinci P, Familiari G, Nottola S, Macchiarelli G Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 13:1539600.

PMID: 40066256 PMC: 11891164. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1539600.


The infiltration of microplastics in human systems: Gastrointestinal accumulation and pathogenic impacts.

Sinha P, Saini V, Varshney N, Pandey R, Jha H Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42606.

PMID: 40061927 PMC: 11889576. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42606.


Profiling microplastics in a forgotten river system in Southern Africa.

Dahms H, Greenfield R Environ Monit Assess. 2025; 197(4):351.

PMID: 40038191 PMC: 11880085. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-025-13800-5.