» Articles » PMID: 39033462

A Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach for Dosing Amiodarone in Children on ECMO

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Jul 21
PMID 39033462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a cardiopulmonary bypass device commonly used to treat cardiac arrest in children. The American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care recommend using amiodarone as a first-line agent to treat ventricular arrhythmias in children with cardiac arrest. However, there are no dosing recommendations for amiodarone to treat ventricular arrhythmias in pediatric patients on ECMO. Amiodarone has a high propensity for adsorption to the ECMO components due to its physicochemical properties leading to altered pharmacokinetics (PK) in ECMO patients. The change in amiodarone PK due to interaction with ECMO components may result in a difference in optimal dosing in patients on ECMO when compared with non-ECMO patients. To address this clinical knowledge gap, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of amiodarone was developed in adults and scaled to children, followed by the addition of an ECMO compartment. The pediatric model included ontogeny functions of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme maturation across various age groups. The ECMO compartment was parameterized using the adsorption data of amiodarone obtained from ex vivo studies. Model predictions captured observed concentrations of amiodarone in pediatric patients with ECMO well with an average fold error between 0.5 and 2. Model simulations support an amiodarone intravenous (i.v) bolus dose of 22 mg/kg (neonates), 13 mg/kg (infants), 8 mg/kg (children), and 6 mg/kg (adolescents). This PBPK modeling approach can be applied to explore the dosing of other drugs used in children on ECMO.

Citing Articles

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach for dosing amiodarone in children on ECMO.

Yellepeddi V, Hunt J, Green D, McKnite A, Whelan A, Watt K CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024; 13(9):1542-1553.

PMID: 39033462 PMC: 11533098. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13199.

References
1.
Wildschut E, Ahsman M, Allegaert K, Mathot R, Tibboel D . Determinants of drug absorption in different ECMO circuits. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36(12):2109-16. PMC: 2981740. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2041-z. View

2.
Eipel C, Abshagen K, Vollmar B . Regulation of hepatic blood flow: the hepatic arterial buffer response revisited. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(48):6046-57. PMC: 3012579. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i48.6046. View

3.
Meagher , Pashley . The Interaction Forces between Silica and Plasma-Treated Polypropylene Surfaces in Aqueous Solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1997; 185(2):291-6. DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.4575. View

4.
Hrudikova Vyskocilova E, Grundmann M, duricova J, Kacirova I . Therapeutic monitoring of amiodarone: pharmacokinetics and evaluation of the relationship between effect and dose/concentration. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2017; 161(2):134-143. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2017.016. View

5.
Willmann S, Hohn K, Edginton A, Sevestre M, Solodenko J, Weiss W . Development of a physiology-based whole-body population model for assessing the influence of individual variability on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007; 34(3):401-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-007-9053-5. View