» Articles » PMID: 39030715

Advancing Environmental Epidemiologic Methods to Confront the Cancer Burden

Overview
Journal Am J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Jul 20
PMID 39030715
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Even though many environmental carcinogens have been identified, studying their effects on specific cancers has been challenging in nonoccupational settings, where exposures may be chronic but at lower levels. Although exposure measurement methods have improved considerably, along with key opportunities to integrate multi-omic platforms, there remain challenges that need to be considered, particularly around the design of studies. Cancer studies typically exclude individuals with prior cancers and start recruitment in midlife. This translates into a failure to capture individuals who may have been most susceptible because of both germline susceptibility and higher early-life exposures that lead to premature mortality from cancer and/or other environmentally caused diseases like lung diseases. Using the example of breast cancer, we demonstrate how integration of susceptibility, both for cancer risk and for exposure windows, may provide a more complete picture regarding the harm of many different environmental exposures. Choice of study design is critical to examining the effects of environmental exposures, and it will not be enough to just rely on the availability of existing cohorts and samples within these cohorts. In contrast, new, diverse, early-onset case-control studies may provide many benefits to understanding the impact of environmental exposures on cancer risk and mortality. This article is part of a Special Collection on Environmental Epidemiology.

Citing Articles

Growing Evidence for the Role of Air Pollution in Breast Cancer Development.

White A J Clin Oncol. 2024; 43(3):244-247.

PMID: 39467215 PMC: 11735286. DOI: 10.1200/JCO-24-01987.

References
1.
Peters A, Nawrot T, Baccarelli A . Hallmarks of environmental insults. Cell. 2021; 184(6):1455-1468. PMC: 9396710. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.043. View

2.
Trowbridge J, Gerona R, Lin T, Rudel R, Bessonneau V, Buren H . Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances in a Cohort of Women Firefighters and Office Workers in San Francisco. Environ Sci Technol. 2020; 54(6):3363-3374. PMC: 7244264. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05490. View

3.
van Donkelaar A, Martin R, Spurr R, Burnett R . High-Resolution Satellite-Derived PM2.5 from Optimal Estimation and Geographically Weighted Regression over North America. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(17):10482-91. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02076. View

4.
Branch F, Woodruff T, Mitro S, Zota A . Vaginal douching and racial/ethnic disparities in phthalates exposures among reproductive-aged women: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2004. Environ Health. 2015; 14:57. PMC: 4502470. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-015-0043-6. View

5.
Phillips K, Milne R, West D, Goodwin P, Giles G, Chang E . Prediagnosis reproductive factors and all-cause mortality for women with breast cancer in the breast cancer family registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18(6):1792-7. PMC: 2746957. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1014. View